1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01258146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The termination of callosal fibres in the auditory cortex of the rat. A combined Golgi-electron microscope and degeneration study

Abstract: When the corpus callosum of the rat is sectioned, the callosal fibres in the cerebral cortex undergo degeneration. In the auditory cortex (area 41) the degenerating axon terminals form asymmetric synapses, and the vast majority of them synapse with dendritic spines. Some other synapse with the shafts of both spiny and smooth dendrites, and a few with the perikarya of non-pyramidal cells. The degenerating axon terminals are contained principally within layer II/III, in which they aggregate in patches. Using a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
23
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although numerous studies have examined transcallosal communication properties [visual cortex: (Glickstein and Berlucchi, 2008;Innocenti, 1980); somatosensory cortex: (Clarey et al, 1996;Rema and Ebner, 2003;Pluto et al, 2005)], to date, the effects of auditory cortex deactivation on acoustically evoked responses of contralateral cortical regions has not been reported. The present study is the first investigation to demonstrate changes in A1 response characteristics induced by reversible cooling deactivation on contralateral auditory fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although numerous studies have examined transcallosal communication properties [visual cortex: (Glickstein and Berlucchi, 2008;Innocenti, 1980); somatosensory cortex: (Clarey et al, 1996;Rema and Ebner, 2003;Pluto et al, 2005)], to date, the effects of auditory cortex deactivation on acoustically evoked responses of contralateral cortical regions has not been reported. The present study is the first investigation to demonstrate changes in A1 response characteristics induced by reversible cooling deactivation on contralateral auditory fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cat, the sources and terminations of callosally projecting neurons have been related to binaural and frequency maps (Imig and Brugge, 1978;Imig et al, 1986). Similarities of origins and terminations of auditory callosal projections in other species, including rat (Cipolloni and Peters, 1983;Games and Winer, 1988;Rüttgers et al, 1990), hamster (Ravizza et al, 1976, and marmoset (Aitkin et al, 1988) demonstrate consistency in connectivity profiles across animal models.…”
Section: Comparison Across Sensory Systemsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bilateral anatomical connections between S1 barrel cortex are most prominent in layers II/III, layer V, and in the septa of layer IV (Welker et al 1988;White and DeAmicis 1977). These afferents are thought to be excitatory (Cipolloni and Peters 1983;Giuffrida and Rustioni 1989). We and others have previously shown in anesthetized rats that S1 neurons in layers V/VI exhibit bilateral whisker responses that are dependent on the integrity of the contralateral S1 cortex (Li et al 2005;Rema and Ebner 2003;Shuler et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further provide evidence that unilateral inactivation of one SI removes, in the intact SI, the suppressive influence previous ipsilateral stimulation exerts on contralaterally evoked activity. Because callosal connections are thought to be excitatory in the rat cortex (Cipolloni and Peters, 1983;Giuffrida and Rustioni, 1989), it is not likely that callosally transmitted ipsilateral input directly contributes to the subsequent inhibition in the opposite hemisphere. Rather, we propose that such inhibitory influence arises locally as a consequence of callosal input, although other sources of inhibition dependent on callosal activity cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: Identifying the Source Of Ipsilaterally Evoked Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%