1967
DOI: 10.2307/1926644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Term Structure of Interest Rates: An Analysis of a Survey of Interest-Rate Expectations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 -day and 6-month gap positions are consistent with perfect foresight forecasts in two years, while the 1-year gap position is consistent in a single year -1986. The rejections of H1 are consistent with Kane and Malkiel's (1967) conclusion that the ability and/or willingness to predict interest rates decreases with the futurity of the rate being predicted. For pure expectations forecasts, H1 is also rejected for 8-year horizon scenarios: the 3-and 6-month gap positions in every year.…”
Section: Sandn Of Exposure Positionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The 1 -day and 6-month gap positions are consistent with perfect foresight forecasts in two years, while the 1-year gap position is consistent in a single year -1986. The rejections of H1 are consistent with Kane and Malkiel's (1967) conclusion that the ability and/or willingness to predict interest rates decreases with the futurity of the rate being predicted. For pure expectations forecasts, H1 is also rejected for 8-year horizon scenarios: the 3-and 6-month gap positions in every year.…”
Section: Sandn Of Exposure Positionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Kane and Malkiel (1967) explains our procedures in more detail arid reports term premia observed in our first (April, 1965) survey.…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectations-forming mechanisms utilized in empirical studies have been varied and inventive. They have included an error-learning mechanism (Meiselman, 1962); distributed lags on past rates (Modigliani and Sutch, 1966) or on inflation (Modigliani and Shiller, 1973;; use of ex post data under an assumption that market efficiency and rationality require that ex post realizations do not differ systematically from ex ante views (Roll, 1970;Fama, 1984a and b); and survey data assumed to reflect the actual expectations of market participants (Kane and Malkiel, 1967;Malkiel and Kane, 1968;Kane, 1983). While affirming the general importance of expectations in influencing the shape of the yield curve, empirical studies have generally rejected the pure form of the expectations hypothesis.…”
Section: (6)mentioning
confidence: 99%