2016
DOI: 10.1177/1528083716654469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tensile behaviour of biaxial and triaxial braided fabrics

Abstract: The tensile behaviour of braid reinforcement is classically described by the behaviour of composite elaborated from these reinforcements. Few studies concern the tensile behaviour of braided fabrics. In this paper biaxial and triaxial braids are manufactured on a braiding loom. The evolution of key parameters as linear mass and braiding angle in function of process parameters is presented. Braid reinforcements are characterized in uniaxial tensile. The mechanical behaviour is analysed and compared in function … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(172 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, yarn behaviour is composed of two main parts: first, a stretching in the direction of the applied load and second, a tensile strength in the same direction. For some 3D warp interlock fabrics architectures, the tensile behaviour is characterized by two peaks in the tensile curve, as schematized in Figure 6, and as exhibited for others fabrics [66]. The appearance of a second peak is due to a significate difference in yarn consumption (warp shrinkage) inside the fabric structure: yarns are not all stretched in the direction of applied load at the same time and breaking occurs in two times.…”
Section: Description Of Mechanical Testsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, yarn behaviour is composed of two main parts: first, a stretching in the direction of the applied load and second, a tensile strength in the same direction. For some 3D warp interlock fabrics architectures, the tensile behaviour is characterized by two peaks in the tensile curve, as schematized in Figure 6, and as exhibited for others fabrics [66]. The appearance of a second peak is due to a significate difference in yarn consumption (warp shrinkage) inside the fabric structure: yarns are not all stretched in the direction of applied load at the same time and breaking occurs in two times.…”
Section: Description Of Mechanical Testsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The hairiness index represents the total length of the protruding fibers concerning the sensing length of 1 cm of the yarn [19]; it was measured with 5 cyclic tests. The cover factor (CF) is used to measure the braiding filament deposition and is defined as the percent of the mandrel surface covered by the braiding tows [20]. Thus, the MBY and CWY cover factors (CF_MBY and CF_CWY) can be defined as the percentage of flax roving surface covered by PP filaments and are calculated by Equations (1) [21] and (2), respectively, where W M is PP filament width (0.60 mm), N M is number of PP filaments in MBY (here N M = 8), R F is effective flax roving radius (0.47 mm), α is PP braiding angle in MBY, and T M is PP wrapping turns per meter in CWY.…”
Section: Textile Properties Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The braid angle greatly affects the mechanical properties of composite braids, and many studies have examined its effect on the mechanical performance of braided composites [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Previous studies have established that an increase in braid angle is accompanied by a decrease in tensile strength [20,21], peak failure load [22,23] and tensile modulus [23,24],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%