This talk is based in archival research in Otto Neurath's correspondence and papers, and secondary and primary reading on the Isle of Man, and on wartime internment policy. It is also based in my own brief research at the Manx Museum in Douglas, my visit to the site of the Onchan internment camp and discussion with friends and relatives of internees in nearby camps. My argument, however is speculative and heuristic, and should be taken in that spirit. In this paper I am interested in teasing out connections, and in working with unresolved loose ends from my research, to address the connections between Neurath's ideas about interior design, furnishing and architecture or everyday objects (chairs, fireplaces, tennis courts, and shoes), with his lived experience of internment and in the context of 1940s Britain.Neurath's politics of design had already been developed in Red Vienna, through his work in relation to housing and settlement in the early 1920s. He shared his ideas about the problems of functionalism in design, and about the social importance of design, with his friend the architect Josef Frank. Neurath recognised the importance of everyday household objects in making possible certain ways of living, a tolerable and viable way of life. Despite this, he was a strong critic of the ideas of shaping a way of life that were held by some modernist designers (for example in the Bauhaus) and concepts of function and causality these implied. In Britain, he also emphatically rejected the idea of social "experiments" -as used to describe the Peckham experiment because of the way they took people's lives as mere objects for study and testing.