1995
DOI: 10.1029/94ja02712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temporal variation of the frequency of high latitude field line resonances

Abstract: The diurnal variation in the frequencies of the continuum of ULF field line resonances has been calculated by using the cross-spectral phase of the north-south components of data from latitudinally spaced ground magnetometers in the Canadian Auroral Network for the OPEN Program Unified Study (CANOPUS) array. On most days the continuum is seen only during the local da3edme, and only a single harmonic with an inverted U-shaped temporal variation in frequency is seen. At 67 ø geomagnetic latitude (L = 6.6) the ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(11 reference statements)
5
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of the cross-phase analysis [Waters et al, 1995] between RAN and ESK indicates that one of the resonance frequencies at that latitude was about 3.3 mHz (not shown). Therefore, it is likely that the field line resonance took place near the L shell of RAN; this is consistent with the result of the analysis of the GOES 7 data (section 2.2) that the resonance shell, if it existed, was located outside of geosynchronous orbit and therefore, on the ground, poleward of GIL.…”
Section: Ground Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of the cross-phase analysis [Waters et al, 1995] between RAN and ESK indicates that one of the resonance frequencies at that latitude was about 3.3 mHz (not shown). Therefore, it is likely that the field line resonance took place near the L shell of RAN; this is consistent with the result of the analysis of the GOES 7 data (section 2.2) that the resonance shell, if it existed, was located outside of geosynchronous orbit and therefore, on the ground, poleward of GIL.…”
Section: Ground Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more exact method for computing field line eigenfrequencies was derived by Singer et al [1981]. The Singer et al [1981] method was then used by considering more and more sophisticated models of the magnetospheric field: Olson-Pftizer model [Walker, 1979;Singer et al, 1981], T87 model [Tsyganenko, 1987;Waters et al, 1995], T89 model [Tsyganenko, 1989;Takahashi et al, 2002], T96 model [Tsyganenko, 1995;Takahashi et al, 2004Takahashi et al, , 2006, T01 model [Tsyganenko, 2002;Berube et al, 2006;Kale et al, 2009], and TS05 model [Tsyganenko and Sitnov, 2005;Takahashi et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in Europe, the two modes show different characteristics: the 1.8 mHz fluctuations are highly coherent over the whole latitudinal range (∼36 • -64 • ) and their power increases monotonically with increasing latitude; conversely, the higher frequency (3.6 mHz) fluctuations are coherent up to NUR (∼57 • ), where their power maximizes; then, between NUR and SOD (∼64 • ), the coherence strongly decreases and at SOD, the frequency is slightly lower and the power decreases. These features might be signatures of a field line resonance at ∼3.6 mHz between NUR and SOD (Southwood, 1974;Chen and Hasegawa, 1974;Waters et al, 1995), which takes energy from the coupling with the magnetospheric compressional mode. The evaluation of the spectral ratio G (or gain factor) and the phase difference between the H components at two adjacent stations can be used as an additional method to investigate this possibility (Baransky et al, 1985;Waters et al, 1991;Menk et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the spectral ratio G (or gain factor) and the phase difference between the H components at two adjacent stations can be used as an additional method to investigate this possibility (Baransky et al, 1985;Waters et al, 1991;Menk et al, 2000). In general, this method requires that the spatial separation between the stations should be small enough to maintain adequate coherence in the wave fields (Waters et al, 1995), but also large enough to resolve the variation of the phase difference; in our study, the separations between pairs of adjacent stations (from 3 • to 8 • , and in particular, 7 • for the couple NUR-SOD) are larger than in the study by Waters et al (1995); however, Menk et al (1999), using station pairs spaced up to ∼6 • , have shown that, for some events, resonance signatures can also be obtained for the most widely spaced station pairs. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%