1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04368.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Temporal Price Relationship between S&P 500 Futures and the S&P 500 Index

Abstract: This paper empirically examines the intraday price relationship between S&P 500 futures and the S&P 500 index using minute‐to‐minute data. Three‐stage least‐squares regression is used to estimate lead and lag relationships with estimates for expiration days of the S&P 500 futures compared with estimates for days prior to expiration. The results suggest that futures price movements consistently lead index movements by twenty to forty‐five minutes while movements in the index rarely affect futures beyond one min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
109
3
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
109
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of authors have examined the relationship between the S&P 500 index and index futures. Kawaller et al (1987), Stoll and Whaley (1990) and Chan (1992), among others, report the S&P 500 futures plays a dominant role in price discovery. Tse (1999 and 2001) finds evidence of a significant bidirectional information flow between the DJIA index and the floor‐traded futures, but reports the futures price leads the cash price in price discovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of authors have examined the relationship between the S&P 500 index and index futures. Kawaller et al (1987), Stoll and Whaley (1990) and Chan (1992), among others, report the S&P 500 futures plays a dominant role in price discovery. Tse (1999 and 2001) finds evidence of a significant bidirectional information flow between the DJIA index and the floor‐traded futures, but reports the futures price leads the cash price in price discovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kawaller, Koch, and Koch (1987) examine the intraday price relationship between S&P 500 Index futures and the corresponding spot index and find that futures price movements consistently lead index movements but only by 20-45 min, which is too short to be captured by a weekend effect. One of the prominent reasons is arbitrage between futures and spot markets that would eliminate the weekend effect in certain securities.…”
Section: Day-of-the-week Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on price discovery confirms that, in general, futures markets lead spot markets but results are inconclusive for currency and Treasury bonds. Kawaller, Koch, and Koch (1987) examine the intraday price relationship between S&P 500 Index futures and the corresponding spot index and find that futures price movements consistently lead index movements but only by 20-45 min, which is too short to be captured by a weekend effect. Thus, arbitrage in currency, equity, and fixed income markets eliminates the possibility of a persistent weekend effect in their futures prices.…”
Section: Day-of-the-week Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed in many empirical studies that stock index futures prices are frequently divergent from and are in many instances below their theoretical values. This problem was interpreted first by Zeckhauser and Niederhoffer (1983) as the result of convenience of short selling in the futures market and its fast reaction to new information relative to the stock market, followed by Kawaller, Koch, and Koch (1987), Chan (1992), Pizzi, Economopoulos, and O'Neill (1998), and Ersoy and Çıtak (2015) along a similar line. On the other hand, Cornell and French (1983a, 1983b) considered it to be the consequence of taxing rather than market inefficiency, although they also pointed out that prohibiting short sales is another significant factor driving the futures price down because it impedes the arbitrage trading and attracts investors to the futures market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%