2021
DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2020-0284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Temporal Pattern of Recovery in Directional Dynamic Stability Post Football-Specific Fatigue

Abstract: Background: Rising injury rates within football require further understanding of the etiological risk factors associated with lower-limb injury. Aim: To examine the temporal pattern of recovery of directional dynamic stability measures post football-specific fatigue. Methods: Eighteen male elite footballers completed baseline assessments of directional dynamic stability measures (Overall Stability Index, anterior–posterior stability [A-P], medial–lateral stability [M-L] on level 1 of the Biodex Stability Syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average methodological quality of the included articles was 0.61 6 0.09 (mean 6 SD) of 1, ranging from 0.43 to 0.73, with 1 article considered of low (#0.50) methodological quality (Table 2). All studies presented high risk of bias arising from the confounding variables, with the exception of Stone et al (40), Page et al (31), and Small et al (37) that were classified as unclear, because of the lack of information on the training time that the subjects performed per week, despite being semiprofessionals, and Rhodes et al (33) and Small et al (38) were classified as low risk. The remaining studies were marked as high risk because of the competitive level (i.e., amateurs or university students), and no information was provided regarding the number of training sessions (Table 3).…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The average methodological quality of the included articles was 0.61 6 0.09 (mean 6 SD) of 1, ranging from 0.43 to 0.73, with 1 article considered of low (#0.50) methodological quality (Table 2). All studies presented high risk of bias arising from the confounding variables, with the exception of Stone et al (40), Page et al (31), and Small et al (37) that were classified as unclear, because of the lack of information on the training time that the subjects performed per week, despite being semiprofessionals, and Rhodes et al (33) and Small et al (38) were classified as low risk. The remaining studies were marked as high risk because of the competitive level (i.e., amateurs or university students), and no information was provided regarding the number of training sessions (Table 3).…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 6 protocols were conducted on the pitch (SSP, CST, SAFT90, BEAST90, T-SAFT90, and LIST), and 3 were conducted in a nonmotorized treadmill (iSPT, CSP, and SMS130). Physical, physiological, and performance markers were evaluated during and immediately after the protocol, but only 1 of the studies evaluated the effects on performance after 24, 48, and 72 hours (33).…”
Section: External Load and Performance Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations