2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temporal evolution of magnesium isotope fractionation during hydromagnesite dissolution, precipitation, and at equilibrium

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
8
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter can be explained by a similar mechanism as proposed for the preferential removal of Mg under acidic conditions; under alkaline conditions, the Si-O bonds break relatively fast compared to the Mg-O bonds. Such a mechanism is consistent with the relative dissolution rates of amorphous SiO 2 compared to those of brucite (Mg(OH) 2 ) at pH >10, with the dissolution rates of brucite, reflecting the rate of breaking Mg-O bonds, being slower than those of amorphous SiO 2 at these alkaline conditions (Fraysse et al, 2006;Oelkers et al, 2018;Pokrovsky and Schott, 2004). The difference in dissolution rates between brucite and amorphous SiO 2 could be due to the protonation of the mineral surfaces as a function of pH, as the point of zero charge of brucite lies at pH 11 (Pokrovsky and Schott, 2004), while that of amorphous SiO 2 lies at pH 2 (Parks, 1967).…”
Section: Non-stoichiometric Dissolution At Alkaline Conditionssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter can be explained by a similar mechanism as proposed for the preferential removal of Mg under acidic conditions; under alkaline conditions, the Si-O bonds break relatively fast compared to the Mg-O bonds. Such a mechanism is consistent with the relative dissolution rates of amorphous SiO 2 compared to those of brucite (Mg(OH) 2 ) at pH >10, with the dissolution rates of brucite, reflecting the rate of breaking Mg-O bonds, being slower than those of amorphous SiO 2 at these alkaline conditions (Fraysse et al, 2006;Oelkers et al, 2018;Pokrovsky and Schott, 2004). The difference in dissolution rates between brucite and amorphous SiO 2 could be due to the protonation of the mineral surfaces as a function of pH, as the point of zero charge of brucite lies at pH 11 (Pokrovsky and Schott, 2004), while that of amorphous SiO 2 lies at pH 2 (Parks, 1967).…”
Section: Non-stoichiometric Dissolution At Alkaline Conditionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The dissolution rates based on either Mg or Si release of sepiolite as measured in the flow through experiments are comparable to those of talc, anthophyllite and chrysotile, but are considerably lower than the dissolution rates of olivine minerals and Ca-bearing silicates (see Figure 8). Oelkers (2001) and Schott et al (2009) attributed the relatively rapid dissolution rates of the olivines at acidic conditions to their structure (see also Oelkers et al, 2018). The dissolution of olivine requires only the breaking of relatively weak divalent metal-oxygen bonds, whereas the dissolution of phyllosilicates requires the additional breaking of Si-O bonds.…”
Section: Dissolution Rates and Mechanisms As A Function Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, continuing our efforts to deciphering the mechanisms controlling the isotopic fractionation of major and trace elements/impurities in carbonate minerals (e.g. Mavromatis et al, 2012;2017c;Oelkers et al, 2018;Saldi et al, 2018;Pearce et al, 2012;Tang et al, 2012;Shirokova et al, 2013), we examine the effect of mineral growth kinetics on Ba isotope fractionation between calcite and aragonite and their forming aqueous solutions. This experimental approach is complemented by first-principles calculations of Ba isotope fractionation at equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology of these magnesium carbonate hydrate particles produced by talc carbonation was visualized by SEM, and the representative images are presented in Figure 1. As can be observed, the magnesium carbonate hydrate particles exhibited four different microscopic morphologies [22][23][24]. In Figure 1a, the needle-like particles were produced, and the axis diameter was in the range of 0.3-0.8 µm.…”
Section: Production Of Magnesium Carbonate Hydrate With Different Mormentioning
confidence: 93%