1955
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temporal course of the effects of postganglionic axotomy on the inferior mesenteric ganglion of the cat

Abstract: Some years ago it was observed (Acheson, Lee & Morison, 1942) that cutting the phrenic nerve caused, over a period of 3 weeks, a progressive central block of the transmission of nerve impulses from the respiratory centre to the axons of the cut phrenic nerve. At that time a similar phenomenon was noted in the inferior mesenteric ganglion: section of the hypogastric nerve caused a progressive block of the transmission of preganglionic volleys to the postganglionic axons of the cut hypogastric nerve (Acheson, 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown & Pascoe (1954), working with cats and rabbits, found that axotomized sympathetic post-ganglionic neurones similarly show reduced responsiveness to synaptic activation, induced by preganglionic stimulation. Comparable findings have been obtained for the cat by Acheson & Remolina (1955) and for the frog by Hunt & Riker (1966), who recorded intracellularly and found alteration of synaptic potentials. Brown & Pascoe (1954) showed that the diminished response to preganglionic stimulation occurred despite a normal level of release of acetylcholine from the preganglionic endings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brown & Pascoe (1954), working with cats and rabbits, found that axotomized sympathetic post-ganglionic neurones similarly show reduced responsiveness to synaptic activation, induced by preganglionic stimulation. Comparable findings have been obtained for the cat by Acheson & Remolina (1955) and for the frog by Hunt & Riker (1966), who recorded intracellularly and found alteration of synaptic potentials. Brown & Pascoe (1954) showed that the diminished response to preganglionic stimulation occurred despite a normal level of release of acetylcholine from the preganglionic endings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…On the other hand, it is possible that alternative sites of termination, perhaps closer to the ganglion, may have been colonized (Langley, 1897), and that this may have induced the restoration of transganglionic transmission to some of the injured neurones. Acheson & Remolina (1955) found for cat inferior mesenteric ganglion that the trans-and post-ganglionic potentials became equal again (though about half the original) between 80 and 120 d postoperatively. Some of the injured neurones indeed fail to survive (cf.…”
Section: Margaret R Mattheivs and Victoria H Nelsonmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To determine neuronal geometry, (Brown & Pascoe, 1954;Acheson & Remolina, 1955;Hunt & Riker, 1966;Pilar & Landmesser, 1972;Matthews & Nelson, 1975), and of mammalian spinal motoneurones (Campbell et Kuno & Llina's 1970a, b). Downman et at.…”
Section: T(9)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes include depression of synaptic transmission (Acheson, Lee & Morison, 1942;Campbell, Mark & Gasteiger, 1949;Downman, Eccles & McIntyre, 1953;Brown & Pascoe, 1954;Acheson & Remolina, 1955; Eccles, Libet & Young, 1958;Hunt & Riker, 1966;Kuno & Llina's, 1970b;Pilar & Landmesser, 1972;Matthews & Nelson, 1975), a complex of morphological changes generally called chromatolysis (see, for example, Lieberman, 1971;Matthews & Raisman, 1972), and changes in neuronal and neuroglial metabolism (Watson, 1965(Watson, , 1968(Watson, , 1969(Watson, , 1970(Watson, , 1972. The effects of axotomy have aroused considerable interest not only because of their dramatic nature, but also because these effects raise the general question of the extent to which a neurone's properties, and even survival, are determined by appropriate peripheral terminations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other possible causes noted above will be considered in approximately ascending order of probability. Local effects of intraganglionic factors such as the products of neuronal degeneration (up to 50 % or more of axotomized sympathetic neurones may die in the longer term; Acheson & Remolina, 1951;Purves, 1975;Smolen, 1983) Thoenen, 1983), and might perhaps also directly have accounted for the hypertrophy of the small cells toward some semblance of principal neurones (cf. Aloe & Levi-Montalcini, 1979); but this is unlikely in adult animals: the effects observed by these groups of investigators were confined to neonatal animals, in which synapse formation and the differentiation of neuronal precursors is still incomplete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%