1999
DOI: 10.2307/2463894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Temporal Coherence of Zooplankton Population Abundances in Neighboring North-Temperate Lakes

Abstract: We investigated the temporal coherence (i.e., the correlation or synchrony between time series) of annual abundances among populations of freshwater zooplankton in eight lakes in Ontario, Canada, from 1980 to 1992. We estimated temporal coherence using the intraclass correlation coefficient (r). While values of r were relatively low among comparisons of all eight lakes, they were statistically significant for three of the seven common cladoceran and copepod taxa (Bosmina longirostris, Leptodiaptomus minutus, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our results indicate that reservoir zonation was not enough to minimise the roles of Moran effects (acting at the spatial scale of the reservoir) or dispersal (facilitated by the hydrological connectivity between sampling sites) as synchronising mechanisms. High and low levels of synchrony between particular pairs of sites may, respectively, overemphasise and obscure patterns of synchrony when the number of sites is small (see a similar reasoning in Rusak et al, 1999). However, our results appear to be robust to this issue as indicated by a sensitivity analysis, where each site was removed before estimating the average levels of synchrony (Supporting Information Figure S5).…”
Section: And 2e Fromsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Thus, our results indicate that reservoir zonation was not enough to minimise the roles of Moran effects (acting at the spatial scale of the reservoir) or dispersal (facilitated by the hydrological connectivity between sampling sites) as synchronising mechanisms. High and low levels of synchrony between particular pairs of sites may, respectively, overemphasise and obscure patterns of synchrony when the number of sites is small (see a similar reasoning in Rusak et al, 1999). However, our results appear to be robust to this issue as indicated by a sensitivity analysis, where each site was removed before estimating the average levels of synchrony (Supporting Information Figure S5).…”
Section: And 2e Fromsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…A silent assumption in correlating zooplankton community structure to environmental variables in such multi-pond observational studies is that all the ponds studied show temporal coherence (i.e., synchronous fluctuations in one or more parameters among locations within a geographic region; Magnuson et al 1990). The literature, however, shows conflicting evidence: both no correlation and positive correlations among lakes were observed by Kratz et al (1987) and Rusak et al (1999) for some species, on a yearly scale, and by George et al (2000) for total summer zooplankton abundances on a seasonal scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Synchrony was calculated as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) between time series of data for each site paired with the main channel (sites responding similarly to the main channel will have high values, close to 1). To avoid bias from differences in ranges of water-level fluctuations, all time-series data were Z-transformed to standardise variances (Rusak et al, 1999). Plots of daily fluctuations and normalised depth plots were used to visually investigate the patterns in water-level fluctuations.…”
Section: Hydrological Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%