2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Temperature–Size Rule in Lecane inermis (Rotifera) is adaptive and driven by nuclei size adjustment to temperature and oxygen combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
88
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underlying explanatory factor in evolutionary inference is the adaptive significance of the observed change (Merilae & Hendry, 2014;Teplitsky & Millien, 2014). Indirect support for adaptation stems from a previous study showing that the body size of another rotifer species, Lecane inermis, was adaptive to combined temperature/oxygen conditions in accordance with the predictions of temperature-size rule (Walczyńska et al, 2015). Consistent with the invoked study, the temperature-size rule may be regarded as an adaptation to temperature-dependent oxygen conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The underlying explanatory factor in evolutionary inference is the adaptive significance of the observed change (Merilae & Hendry, 2014;Teplitsky & Millien, 2014). Indirect support for adaptation stems from a previous study showing that the body size of another rotifer species, Lecane inermis, was adaptive to combined temperature/oxygen conditions in accordance with the predictions of temperature-size rule (Walczyńska et al, 2015). Consistent with the invoked study, the temperature-size rule may be regarded as an adaptation to temperature-dependent oxygen conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The driving role of oxygen in temperature-size rule was hypothesized by Atkinson et al (2006). Since then, it was confirmed in several other studies Hoefnagel & Verberk, 2015;Horne et al, 2015;Walczyńska et al, 2015) and rejected in one meta-analysis (Klok & Harrison, 2013). In the context of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, the temperature-size rule can be considered as being ''responsive'' (sensu Whitman & Agrawal, 2009) with regard to temperature, but ''anticipatory'' with regard to oxygen, possibly because mechanisms of response to temperature are better developed than those of response to oxygen, as was previously suggested by Walczyńska et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In other words, the temperature-size rule emerges when natural selection favors genotypes that mature earlier at a smaller size in warmer environments (Kozlowski et al 2004). Accordingly, Walczyń ska et al (2015) demonstrated a fecundity advantage of large rotifers (Lecane inermis) in cold water, but small rotifers in warm and hypoxic water. For eutelic species, such as K. cochlearis, growth and reproduction involve a tradeoff between cell size and body size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prediction has sound empirical support, as benthic amphipods were found to be larger with increased oxygen content in water (Chapelle & Peck, 1999; but see also Makarieva, Gorshkov, & Li, 2005; and Verberk, Bilton, Calosi, & Spicer, 2011), Drosophila melanogaster was found to be smaller in hypoxia conditions, and this effect was enhanced at high temperatures (Frazier, Woods, & Harrison, 2001), smaller Lecane inermis rotifers laid more eggs, which indicates higher fitness, than larger individuals at high temperature/low oxygen conditions (Walczyńska, Labecka, Sobczyk, Czarnoleski, & Kozłowski, 2015), while the rotifer Keratella cochlearis increased with decreasing temperature in its natural habitat, although this pattern was constrained in poorly oxygenated water (Czarnoleski, Ejsmont‐Karabin, Angilletta, & Kozlowski, 2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong natural negative correlation between temperature and oxygen (Denny, 1993; Garcia & Gordon, 1992; Wetzel, 2001) means that TSR may be considered as being responsive with regard to temperature but anticipatory with regard to oxygen, possibly because mechanisms of response to temperature are better developed in living organisms than those of response to oxygen, as was previously suggested by Walczyńska et al. (2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%