2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gc006497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temperature of the Icelandic mantle from olivine‐spinel aluminum exchange thermometry

Abstract: New crystallization temperatures for four eruptions from the Northern Volcanic Zone of Iceland are determined using olivine-spinel aluminum exchange thermometry. Differences in the olivine crystallization temperatures between these eruptions are consistent with variable extents of cooling during fractional crystallization. However, the crystallization temperatures for Iceland are systematically offset to higher temperatures than equivalent olivine-spinel aluminum exchange crystallization temperatures published… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
149
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
17
149
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On Figure 2, I compared the calculated trends with the observed variation in Icelandic basalts produced in the rift zones at the coasts (GEOROC database). Consistent with the calculations, magma production in this context is thought to reflect a passive plate spreading alone (Brown andLesher, 2014, Shorttle et al, 2014) and T P = 1480 °C is in agreement with the most recent estimated potential mantle temperature beneath Iceland (Matthews et al, 2016). Calculated crust thicknesses are in fact similar to the estimated crustal thicknesses in Iceland's rift zones (Darbyshire et al, 2000).…”
Section: Implications For the Nature Of The Mantle Heterogeneity Benesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…On Figure 2, I compared the calculated trends with the observed variation in Icelandic basalts produced in the rift zones at the coasts (GEOROC database). Consistent with the calculations, magma production in this context is thought to reflect a passive plate spreading alone (Brown andLesher, 2014, Shorttle et al, 2014) and T P = 1480 °C is in agreement with the most recent estimated potential mantle temperature beneath Iceland (Matthews et al, 2016). Calculated crust thicknesses are in fact similar to the estimated crustal thicknesses in Iceland's rift zones (Darbyshire et al, 2000).…”
Section: Implications For the Nature Of The Mantle Heterogeneity Benesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…An alternative suite of constraints comes from analyses of mid‐ocean ridge basalt geochemistry. A variety of petrologic and geochemical studies yield similar estimates for ambient mantle potential temperatures (e.g., 1250–1350°C: Katsura et al, ; 1280–1400°C: Herzberg et al, ; 1314–1464°C: Dalton et al, ; 131832+44C: Matthews et al, ). Geochemical and geophysical arguments are therefore in reasonable agreement for ambient potential temperatures of T = 1340 ± 60°C.…”
Section: Modeling Strategymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is useful to compare estimates of T P with the potential temperature of ambient convecting mantle. Estimates of this ambient value vary depending upon methodology (e.g., Dalton et al, ; Herzberg et al, ; Katsura et al, ; Matthews et al, ). Throughout this section, we exploit the adiabatic melting models of McKenzie and Bickle () and Katz et al ().…”
Section: Magmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%