2021
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmab173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The telehealth divide: health inequity during the COVID-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concerns expressed by the study population regarding the impact of virtual visits and asynchronous communication consultations have been expressed by patients and clinicians 40,41 and were the focus of UK media in the period before study recruitment opened. 20 Students were anxious about the lack of opportunities to perform physical examinations on patients and to pick up on important visual cues without face-to-face consultations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concerns expressed by the study population regarding the impact of virtual visits and asynchronous communication consultations have been expressed by patients and clinicians 40,41 and were the focus of UK media in the period before study recruitment opened. 20 Students were anxious about the lack of opportunities to perform physical examinations on patients and to pick up on important visual cues without face-to-face consultations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is consistent with previous studies reporting particularly high information seeking needs among lower-income pregnant women [30,31], who represent a population at risk of developing pregnancy complications potentially due to unequal access to healthcare [32] or inadequate self-education capacities. Although differences emerged according to family income, with the poorest expectant and new parents expressing higher needs and expectations for the proposed app, attention must also be paid to the potential difficulties associated with the broader family income, which in turn could exacerbate rather than bridge the health divide that makes access to these mHealth solutions difficult due to the cost of the required device (e.g., smartphone, webcam, computer) or due to barriers caused by unstable Internet connections [33,34] in hard-to-reach areas. In addition, future and new mothers' expectations for the proposed mHealth solution were higher than those of future and new fathers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent global pandemic renewed the significance of telecommunication as a critical infrastructure worldwide, as many COVID responses such as working from home, home-schooling, and e-commerce require quality access to the Internet. However, in reality, COVID exposed significant inequities and inequalities of access to telecommunication at transnational and transregional scales – even within cities and towns (Fisher and Magin 2021; Tienken 2020). With this in mind, it is interesting to note that in 1995, 25 years prior to COVID, Australia’s Prime Minister Paul Keating declared that "… access to the national information infrastructure will be no less a general right than access to water, or public transport or electricity” (Keating 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%