This review examines the history of the Sarawak "Cycles" and their application in subdividing offshore Cenozoic stratigraphy. The Cycles are widely but inconsistently used, at least in part because important reports and data collections were never published (e.g. Geiger, 1964;Hageman et al., 1987; Hageman maps, 1985, eventually reproduced in Madon, 1999and Hutchison, 2005and Taylor et al., 1997) or were published in highly abridged summaries only (Ho Kiam Fui, 1978;Mansor et al., 1999). The lack of a data-audit trail left open possibilities for ambiguity and confusion, as has been commented on by several workers (e.g. Snedden et al., 1995;Ismail & Tucker, 1999). This account reviews the major contributions, published and unpublished, and the concepts of the Cycles, especially over times of geological change. The data behind the model is cited in order to give confidence when integrating Sarawak stratigraphic data into a regional geological model. The Cycles began with an assumption that transgressions over regressive surfaces were distinct and approximately synchronous events for correlation. By including biostratigraphic data these transgressive events could be traced into clay-dominated areas, where lithological and seismic contrast was weak. This integrated approach was carried out through the 1970's and 80's, during which time the data pushed the model towards a three dimensional view of sedimentation, with the basin shape evolving and changing through time. However, development of a full tectono-stratigraphic model paused during the period of accelerated seismic capabilities of the 1990's and early 21 st Century. While geophysical data coverage increased, application of geological analyses decreased, and the integrated approach lost momentum. This review aims to re-establish the role of the Cycles as a part of a large scale geological model. An initial integration with regional geological events is attempted, linking some of the Cycle boundaries with times of known tectonic change.
78beyond the main Neogene clinoform, in deep water, with no Luconia reefs. Finally, onshore there was uplift where an older Miocene trend has been over-printed by a later Miocene uplift that is parallel to the present day coastline. In the coastal and nearshore areas there is strong reverse faulting, so this southern area, with its own distinct geological history, is called the Tinjar province.The challenge was how to correlate, and predict facies into un-drilled areas, in this broad region of sedimentation, with its gradual trend from coastal plain sediments in the south to open marine environments in the north, and how to correlate from clastic to carbonate facies in order to combine their sedimentological histories
HISTORY OF STUDIESThe tools required to identify different facies in Sarawak sediments were developed early on, but the ability to correlate and thereby map facies variation at a specific time has always been challenging. Age diagnostic fossils occurred only rarely and consequently indicated only a general age, and ...