1989
DOI: 10.2307/4087771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Taxonomic Status of the Small Ground-Finch, Geospiza (Aves: Emberizidae) of Genovesa Island, Galápagos, and Its Relevance to Interspecific Competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple answer would be yes, but the situation is made complex by the lack of concordance between phenotypic and genetic variation. The morphological analyses confirm previous studies in showing that the Genovesa population resembles other populations of G. dzfiilis in shape and G.3liginosa in size (Schluter & Grant, 1984a;Vagvolgyi & Vagvolgyi, 1989Schluter et al, 199 1). Analyses of vocalizations show that individuals on Genovesa have (a) features in common with other populations of G. dficilis but not shared by other Geospiza species (buzzy song and high frequencies), and (b) features shared both conspecifically and heterospecifically (whistles and repeated songs).…”
Section: Evohtionav Histov Of the Population On Genovesasupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A simple answer would be yes, but the situation is made complex by the lack of concordance between phenotypic and genetic variation. The morphological analyses confirm previous studies in showing that the Genovesa population resembles other populations of G. dzfiilis in shape and G.3liginosa in size (Schluter & Grant, 1984a;Vagvolgyi & Vagvolgyi, 1989Schluter et al, 199 1). Analyses of vocalizations show that individuals on Genovesa have (a) features in common with other populations of G. dficilis but not shared by other Geospiza species (buzzy song and high frequencies), and (b) features shared both conspecifically and heterospecifically (whistles and repeated songs).…”
Section: Evohtionav Histov Of the Population On Genovesasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A simple answer would be yes, but the situation is made complex by the lack of concordance between phenotypic and genetic variation. The morphological analyses confirm previous studies in showing that the Genovesa population resembles other populations of G. dzfiilis in shape and G.3liginosa in size (Schluter & Grant, 1984a;Vagvolgyi & Vagvolgyi, 1989Schluter et al, 199 1 , 1986;, nor do morphological and vocal traits covary completely. Lack of concordance presents a problem when attempting to reconstruct evolutionary history and assess phylogenetic affinities (Patterson, 1987).…”
Section: Evohtionav Histov Of the Population On Genovesasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition to difficulties with identifying some individuals, the classification of entire Geospiza populations does not always withstand scrutiny. It has been suggested, for example, that Geo-spiza difficilis on Genovesa Island may be more appropriately classified as G. fuliginosa, based on both song and morphological characteristics (Vagvolgyi and Vagvolgyi 1989). Another example comes from unusually large finch specimens from San Cristobal and Floreana Islands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, song differences (Ratcliffe, ) and song discrimination (Ratcliffe & Grant, ) are statistically stronger between sympatric species pairs than between allopatric species pairs. However, countering this trend, Grant () reported that female G. conirostris on Genovesa avoid mates with songs similar to their fathers, which Goodale & Podos () suggest is a result of selection to avoid inbreeding (see also Vagvolgyi & Vagvolgyi, ).…”
Section: Species Limits and The Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…). An example of this process can be found in the analysis by Vagvolgyi & Vagvolgyi (, p. 147): ‘… Genovesa supports G. difficilis which, in the absence of the competing species G. fuliginosa , underwent profound changes in its diet and morphology to become deceptively similar to the absent competitor.’…”
Section: Why Have Ground Finch Ecomorphs Not Become Species?mentioning
confidence: 99%