2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11230-008-9142-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The taxonomic status of Spatulifer cf. maringaensis Pavanelli & Rego, 1989 (Eucestoda: Proteocephalidea) from Sorubim lima (Bloch & Schneider) (Pisces: Siluriformes), and the use of the microthrix pattern in the discrimination of Spatulifer spp.

Abstract: de Chambrier & Vaucher (1999) compared the proteocephalidean cestode Spatulifer maringaensis Pavanelli & Rego, 1989 from Hemisorubim platyrhynchos (Valenciennes) with similar specimens, which they described as S. cf. maringaensis, parasitising Sorubim lima (Bloch & Schneider) collected in the Paraná and Paraguay Rivers. No remarkable differences between these worms were found by these authors, except for the scolex diameter and a different infection rate in each fish host. In order to elucidate the taxonomic s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the type of microtriches that covers the proliferation zone has been scarcely included in the descriptions of proteocephalidean species and thus future studies should test validity of this putative synapomoprhy of the Onchoproteocephalidea. For example, the new species described herein, Spatulifer maringaensis Pavanelli et Rego, 1989 and Luciaella ivanovae Gil de Pertierra, 2009 have not gladiate spinitriches covering the proliferation zone (Arredondo andGil de Pertierra 2008, Gil de Pertierra 2009, present study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…However, the type of microtriches that covers the proliferation zone has been scarcely included in the descriptions of proteocephalidean species and thus future studies should test validity of this putative synapomoprhy of the Onchoproteocephalidea. For example, the new species described herein, Spatulifer maringaensis Pavanelli et Rego, 1989 and Luciaella ivanovae Gil de Pertierra, 2009 have not gladiate spinitriches covering the proliferation zone (Arredondo andGil de Pertierra 2008, Gil de Pertierra 2009, present study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In contrast to the present study, Moravec et al (2002) did not observe seasonal variation. A 100% prevalence in C. piquiti was also reported in fish parasitized by Proteocephalus chamelensis (Pérez Ponce de Leó n et al, 1995) and by S. maringaensis (De Chambrier & Vaucher, 1999;Arredondo & Gil de Pertierra, 2008). According to Scholz (1987), larger perch were the most parasitized by Proteocephalus percae Mü ller, 1780.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…spinulifera Woodland, 1934; Nomimoscolex lopesi Rego, 1990;N. sudobim Woodland, 1935; Peltidocotyle rugosa Diesing, 1850; Regoella brevis Arredondo, de Chambrier et Gil de Pertierra, 2013; Spatulifer rugosa (Woodland, 1935) (see Gil de Pertierra 2005, de Chambrier et al 2006, Arredondo and Gil de Pertierra 2008; Pseudocrepidobothrium chanaorum is thus the eighth species reported from this fish host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%