2021
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The taxonomic impediment: a shortage of taxonomists, not the lack of technical approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the possibility of having an available team of taxonomists as diverse as the one orchestrated for this study is low. Hence, considering that it is widely recognized that the shortage of taxonomists is critical for addressing the current biodiversity crisis [79], and molecular technology is still imprecise for cryptic organism in reefs [2,22], more people need to be trained in reef invertebrate taxonomy, but simultaneously, larger molecular databases necessary for effective metabarcoding should be built.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the possibility of having an available team of taxonomists as diverse as the one orchestrated for this study is low. Hence, considering that it is widely recognized that the shortage of taxonomists is critical for addressing the current biodiversity crisis [79], and molecular technology is still imprecise for cryptic organism in reefs [2,22], more people need to be trained in reef invertebrate taxonomy, but simultaneously, larger molecular databases necessary for effective metabarcoding should be built.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I strongly recommend the reading of papers such as Pinheiro et al (2019), Dupérré (2020), Zamani et al (2020), Ahrens et al (2021), Engel et al (2021, Meier et al (2021), Srivathsan et al (2021) and references cited there (other papers provide slightly different alternatives or approaches, and are also recommended reading, e.g., Brower (2010), Blaxter (2016), Goulding & Dayrat (2016), Renner (2016), Brown & Wong (2020), Vences (2020); this list is not exhaustive). And to present a more complete and fairer picture, the reader should also consider a second paper by Sharkey et al (2021b) which tried to provide counterarguments to some of the received criticism (although that paper has also been met with additional counterarguments on its own, e.g., Ahrens et al (2021), Engel et al (2021 and Meier et al (2021)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the months following that paper, the scientific community has engaged in lively discussions about "how useful" such descriptions are, whether they in fact impede the cataloguing of biodiversity, "how valid" (from the ICZN perspective) those species are, and general issues about the future of taxonomy, shortcomings of BINs and even BOLD (e.g., Ahrens et al 2021, Engel et al 2021, Meier et al 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they might supply pollen and could potentially be used as managed pollinators. In addition, this knowledge gap is closely related to lack of taxonomists due to limited incentive to the development of taxonomy as a discipline in Chile, which is part of a global phenomenon [120]. Currently, research funds available in Chile do not fund studies whose objective is increasing taxonomic knowledge and classification of species.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps On Pollinators and Pollination In Chilementioning
confidence: 99%