1984
DOI: 10.2307/1919154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tax Man Cometh: Ideological Opposition to Internal Taxes, 1760-1790

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Morgans [1953] were of the view that the distinction was never a popular one. Slaughter [1984], however, maintains that the distinction remained significant throughout the pre-revolutionary period and beyond because it was never really resolved.…”
Section: The Colonial Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Morgans [1953] were of the view that the distinction was never a popular one. Slaughter [1984], however, maintains that the distinction remained significant throughout the pre-revolutionary period and beyond because it was never really resolved.…”
Section: The Colonial Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, it relied on a narrow construction of Article I's substantive scope that mollified the American anti-tax contingent. It seized on a distinction between “internal” and “external” taxes that held immense significance for revolutionary-era Americans (Slaughter 1984). Above all, import duties held the virtue of minimal intrusiveness.…”
Section: Introduction: Forgotten Moments In Early Federal Governancementioning
confidence: 99%