2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-008-9165-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tau Model for Data Redundancy and Information Combination in Earth Sciences: Theory and Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this can be more complicated for Bordley's formula, where there is not the restriction S w ¼1. For this formula, one of the most common approaches is to assume unitary weights, which correspond to the assumption of conditional independence among sources of information (Journel, 2002;Krishnan, 2008). Different weight choices are explored in the following test cases.…”
Section: Weights Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this can be more complicated for Bordley's formula, where there is not the restriction S w ¼1. For this formula, one of the most common approaches is to assume unitary weights, which correspond to the assumption of conditional independence among sources of information (Journel, 2002;Krishnan, 2008). Different weight choices are explored in the following test cases.…”
Section: Weights Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the weights should not be constant (Krishnan, 2008), because they may depend on the data configuration. However, the complete cpdf (Eq.…”
Section: Weights Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling assumption with respect to the factors of Equation (6) of the τ -model [23][24][25] is:…”
Section: Weights-of-evidence Vs the τ -Or ν-Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each grid cell, two probabilities are available to simulate a geologic unit: (1) the conditional probability obtained using the search tree partitioning method, in the horizontal direction, and (2) the conditional probabilities obtained using the 1D vertical variograms and indicator kriging method in the vertical direction (Deutsch and Journel, 1998). The two probabilities are combined using the tau model (Krishnan and others, 2005;Krishnan, 2008), which provides a solution for integrating partially redundant data. The geologic unit is then assigned by drawing a discrete category from the resulting posterior probability distribution.…”
Section: Geostatistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%