2020
DOI: 10.1080/14614103.2020.1800344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Taphonomy of Plant and Livestock Dung Microfossils: An Ethnoarchaeological and Experimental Approach

Abstract: This study examines the contribution of ethnoarchaeological and experimental research to interdisciplinary approaches on the identification and taphonomy of livestock dung.Ethnographic and experimental records provide comparative reference models on a range of taphonomic issues that are still understudied, such as variation in the type and preservation of plant and faecal microfossils that are excreted with dung and the effects of heating. The focus in the present study is on the taphonomy of ingested phytolit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evaluation builds on recent ethnoarchaeological work conducted on livestock management, grazing, foddering, seasonality, penning, dung collection, manipulation, and use, as well as on modern reference dung sampling, followed by geoarchaeological, archaeobotanical, zooarchaeological, geochemical, biochemical, and isotope analyses from different core regions, including, from east to west: (i) the foothills of the Zagros mountains of Iraqi Kurdistan [17,18,[40][41][42]; (ii) the Konya plain in central Anatolia, Turkey [6,29]; (iii) the Upper Khabur in northeastern Syria, northern Levant [15]; (iv) the Wadi Faynan in southern Jordan, southern Levant [16]; (v) the Negev Highlands, southern Israel, southern Levant [14]; and (vi) the High Tell in northwestern Tunisia, Eastern Maghreb [9,10].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This evaluation builds on recent ethnoarchaeological work conducted on livestock management, grazing, foddering, seasonality, penning, dung collection, manipulation, and use, as well as on modern reference dung sampling, followed by geoarchaeological, archaeobotanical, zooarchaeological, geochemical, biochemical, and isotope analyses from different core regions, including, from east to west: (i) the foothills of the Zagros mountains of Iraqi Kurdistan [17,18,[40][41][42]; (ii) the Konya plain in central Anatolia, Turkey [6,29]; (iii) the Upper Khabur in northeastern Syria, northern Levant [15]; (iv) the Wadi Faynan in southern Jordan, southern Levant [16]; (v) the Negev Highlands, southern Israel, southern Levant [14]; and (vi) the High Tell in northwestern Tunisia, Eastern Maghreb [9,10].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geo-ethnoarchaeological work conducted over recent years in the lower Zagros mountains has focused on livestock management, penning, grazing, foddering, manuring and other domestic activities, as well as on modern dung sampling, within the framework of ongoing archaeological excavations at Early Neolithic Bestansur, located on the western edge of the Shahrizor Plain in Iraqi Kurdistan, included on the UNESCO World Heritage Tentative List. These studies were followed by zooarchaeological, phytolith, dung spherulite, isotope, and soil analyses, in addition to comparative experimental burning of fresh dung pellets under laboratory-controlled conditions [17,18,[40][41][42]. These investigations have explored how several households from the modern village of Bestansur (ca.…”
Section: The Foothills Of the Zagros Mountains Iraqi Kurdistanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Geo-ethnoarchaeological studies, especially micromorphological investigations since the 1980s, have helped to define a variety of animal dung-related archaeological deposits including characterization of pellets of a variety of herbivores (Brönnimann et al 2017), dung fuel (Gur-Arieh et al 2013;Portillo et al 2017Portillo et al , 2020, and stabling enclosures (Wattez et al 1990;Macphail et al 1997;Shahack-Gross et al 2003;Milek 2012;Shahack-Gross 2017). Many of these studies focused on dung (faecal) spherulites, direct indicators of animal dung in archaeological sediments.…”
Section: The Impact Of Geoarchaeological Identification Of Archaeologmentioning
confidence: 99%