2009
DOI: 10.1086/649507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The TAOS Project: High-Speed Crowded Field Aperture Photometry

Abstract: We have devised an aperture photometry pipeline for data reduction of image data from the Taiwanese-American Occultation Survey (TAOS). The photometry pipeline has high computational performance, and is capable of real-time photometric reduction of images containing up to 1000 stars, within the sampling rate of 5 Hz. The pipeline is optimized for both speed and signal-to-noise performance, and in the latter category it performs nearly as well as DAOPHOT. This paper provides a detailed description of the TAOS a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we have developed a method to test for widespread dependence between lightcurves in a data run, which allows us to reject runs with inherent characteristics which could possibly give rise to a larger false positive rates. We note that while the method described in this paper is sufficient for the calculation of the rate of false positive events that arise due to random statistical chance, it is not capable of estimating the background event rate due to systematic errors in the TAOS photometry (Zhang et al 2009). For example, tracking errors or moving objects in the images could give rise to false detections in the data set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we have developed a method to test for widespread dependence between lightcurves in a data run, which allows us to reject runs with inherent characteristics which could possibly give rise to a larger false positive rates. We note that while the method described in this paper is sufficient for the calculation of the rate of false positive events that arise due to random statistical chance, it is not capable of estimating the background event rate due to systematic errors in the TAOS photometry (Zhang et al 2009). For example, tracking errors or moving objects in the images could give rise to false detections in the data set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Due to the fact that any correlations in the data may not show up in lightcurves with low SNR values, we perform the diagnostic tests only on those lightcurve sets with SNR ≥ 10. Details of the algorithm used to calculate SNR values of our lightcurves are given in Zhang et al (2009). To summarize, we first calculate a 5σ-clipped rolling mean similar to that which is calculated in the mean filter, and then average the value of the rolling mean to get the signal.…”
Section: Application Of Diagnostic Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of course a limitation of aperture photometry in crowded fields, but it could be partly addressed by trialing a method to implement source-specific apertures that are adapted to every target in the field. 47 We also plot the predicted SNR as observed with an EMCCD at the same plate scale as the Kinetix in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Scmos Noise Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note that a number of the faintest detected sources have overestimated SNRs, which we believe is due to blending of the aperture fluxes with bright neighboring sources in this crowded field. This is of course a limitation of aperture photometry in crowded fields, but it could be partly addressed by trialing a method to implement source-specific apertures that are adapted to every target in the field 47 . We also plot the predicted SNR as observed with an EMCCD at the same plate scale as the Kinetix in Fig.…”
Section: Observations At Mcdonald Observatorymentioning
confidence: 99%