2016
DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2016.1206153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Talk About the Psychiatric Patient

Abstract: Essential to psychiatric nursing practice and care, verbal handovers and ward rounds are reporting systems for communication that shapes psychiatric staff's ability to recognize, understand, and construct patients, as well as patients' ability to construct themselves. Given the centrality of such language in psychiatric practice, the aim of this study was to describe how psychiatric staff talk about patients in psychiatric wards, what their talk encompasses, and what consequences it might pose for patient care… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite advances in risk assessment research, the current evidence base has lagged in terms of management interventions. This may partly be because frontline staff members, such as nurses and healthcare assistants who take a hands-on approach in the delivery of care plans, are perhaps not always involved in the completion of violence risk assessment process or relevant risk information is not sufficiently communicated (Bruton, Norton, Smyth, Ward & Day, 2016;Eivergard, Enmarker & Hellzen, 2016). The question of whether SPJ tools are effective and efficient in respect of risk management requires further exploration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advances in risk assessment research, the current evidence base has lagged in terms of management interventions. This may partly be because frontline staff members, such as nurses and healthcare assistants who take a hands-on approach in the delivery of care plans, are perhaps not always involved in the completion of violence risk assessment process or relevant risk information is not sufficiently communicated (Bruton, Norton, Smyth, Ward & Day, 2016;Eivergard, Enmarker & Hellzen, 2016). The question of whether SPJ tools are effective and efficient in respect of risk management requires further exploration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%