2021
DOI: 10.3390/jtaer16070152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tales of Alphanumerical Symbols in Media: The Case of Bitcoin

Abstract: Bitcoin, a decentralized cryptocurrency, has not only given rise to a wave of digital innovations but also stirred up considerable controversy. Some have hailed it as the most significant innovation since the Internet, while others have dismissed it as a Ponzi scheme that should be abandoned and forbidden. Regardless of these varying views, this is an innovation in need of scrutiny. In this paper we present a metastory of Bitcoin, based on an interpretative study of 737 news articles between 2011–2019. Through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, there are three main types of solutions to the blockchain fork problem. (1) Through the consensus algorithm [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], the system finally converges to a stable state with only one blockchain branch after the fork occurs, but this method does not reduce the probability of forking; (2) By specifying a special node to be responsible for the whole process of transaction and block verification and confirmation [20][21][22][23][24], or adding synchronization restrictions to increase the global scope of transaction and block verification and confirmation operations orderly [25], thereby avoiding the occurrence of forks, but reducing the decentralization characteristics of the blockchain network, and the additional synchronization limit will lead to a large synchronization overhead; (3) To reduce the likelihood of splits, optimize the blockchain network's transaction and block propagation algorithms. The study on lowering the likelihood of forks in blockchain networks by improving block and transaction propagation methods falls into three categories: optimizing blockchain network structure, propagation behaviour of a single node, and pipelining the propagation process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are three main types of solutions to the blockchain fork problem. (1) Through the consensus algorithm [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], the system finally converges to a stable state with only one blockchain branch after the fork occurs, but this method does not reduce the probability of forking; (2) By specifying a special node to be responsible for the whole process of transaction and block verification and confirmation [20][21][22][23][24], or adding synchronization restrictions to increase the global scope of transaction and block verification and confirmation operations orderly [25], thereby avoiding the occurrence of forks, but reducing the decentralization characteristics of the blockchain network, and the additional synchronization limit will lead to a large synchronization overhead; (3) To reduce the likelihood of splits, optimize the blockchain network's transaction and block propagation algorithms. The study on lowering the likelihood of forks in blockchain networks by improving block and transaction propagation methods falls into three categories: optimizing blockchain network structure, propagation behaviour of a single node, and pipelining the propagation process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research lacks the institutional context from which the technology emerges (Hedman et al, 2021) and hence, technology contextualization must be recognized as part of the wider socioeconomic and political landscape (Currie, 2009). Drawing on institutional theory (in particular institutional work) and framing analysis (the diagnostic, prognostic, motivational functions, and framing mechanisms), this study investigates the process of meaning construction, contestation and stabilization between institutional actors from the organizational field of crypto-assets and policymakers in the policymaking process leading up to MiCA.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%