2018
DOI: 10.1086/698135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Systems Fallacy: A Genealogy and Critique of Public Policy and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Abstract: This essay identifies the systems fallacy: the mistaken belief that systems-analytic decisionmaking techniques, such as cost-benefit or public policy analysis, are neutral and objective, when in fact they normatively shape political outcomes. The systems fallacy is the mistaken belief that there could be a nonnormative or scientific way to analyze and implement public policy that would not affect political values. That pretense is mistaken because the very act of conceptualizing and defining a metaphorical sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, their lack or limited inclusion into top-down climate policy mixes by policymakers often results in excluding these policies from analysis. Policies impact mitigation regardless of how they are assembled by policymakers, yet limited research undertakes this epistemology of climate change mitigation (Harcourt, 2018). This has created a gap both in the conceptual and empirical literature.…”
Section: Setting the Scene: Climate Policyscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, their lack or limited inclusion into top-down climate policy mixes by policymakers often results in excluding these policies from analysis. Policies impact mitigation regardless of how they are assembled by policymakers, yet limited research undertakes this epistemology of climate change mitigation (Harcourt, 2018). This has created a gap both in the conceptual and empirical literature.…”
Section: Setting the Scene: Climate Policyscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal of systematized, quantified government decision-making has roots in operations research, with its ambition to develop neutral, scientific, and objective techniques for analyzing situations and determining optimal courses of action (Harcourt 2018). A key early actor was the RAND Corporation, a think tank founded in 1948 to provide research to the US Air Force.…”
Section: Roots and Growth Of Public Sector Algorithmic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%