The Systemic Turn and Participatory Budgeting: The Case of Rio Grande do Sul

Legard, Sveinung; Goldfrank, Benjamin

doi:10.1017/s0022216x20000954

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The e-participatory budgeting case is an illustration of this regard. Legard and Goldfrank ( 2021 ) show that roughly two-thirds of online voters reported that they would not have voted in participatory budgeting if there had been no online option; and that the budget decisions gained substantial legitimacy by enhancing the inclusion and empowerment of citizens.…”

Section: Review Results and Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

How does technological system design affect value creation? A systematic literature review of digital co-production

Wang

Song

2022

GPPG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The existing studies on co-production display two research gaps. First, most studies focus on non-digital/offline co-production and value creation; little attention has been paid to value creation of digital/online co-production cases. Second, traditional co-production studies examine political, organizational, administrative, and personal factors that influence co-production. However, few studies investigate how technological factors will affect co-production in terms of value creation. To bridge the gaps, this article conducts a systematic literature review of 52 articles. The review results distill seven technological factors and five value categories from digital co-production cases. It further examines how these technological factors affect the creation of various value categories. Based on the review results, this article proposes a future research agenda on digital co-production.

show abstract

Section: Review Results and Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

How does technological system design affect value creation? A systematic literature review of digital co-production

Wang

Song

2022

GPPG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Displacement and Citizen Participation: A Comparison of the Enactment of E-Participation Platforms in Oslo and Madrid

Legard¹

2022

Citizen Participation in the Information Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growing digitization of citizen participation has been accompanied by the concern that e-participation technologies will displace traditional forms of participation and representation. This chapter contributes to the discussions on ‘hybrid’ and ‘multichannel’ participation, by arguing that the relationship between e-participation and traditional, analogue forms of citizen participation is uneasy. The level of conflict and displacement caused by the introduction of e-participation technologies depends on how they are enacted. This chapter compares the introduction of e-participation platforms in Madrid and Oslo, and finds that the new technologies in Madrid deprived traditional channels of citizen participation or their role, but in Oslo were used to complement existing forms of analogue participation. This chapter uses technology enactment theory and an inductive case-study approach, to develop the hypothesis that e-participation technologies can both be enacted in ways that add something to an institutional environment, but also to achieve drastic change and that this is the outcome of agency.

show abstract

The Impact of Digital Participation on Democratic Urban Governance

Legard¹,

Hovik²

2022

Citizen Participation in the Information Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This concluding chapter examines the effect on democracy of different approaches to the digitalization of citizen participation. We investigate how well different e-participation models perform on the dimensions of inclusiveness, deliberation and popular control, the models examined being the online direct democracy model in Madrid, the digital crowdsourcing model in Melbourne and the e-bricolage model in Oslo. Digital technologies can, compared with analogue participation, enable cities to reach out to a larger number of people and strengthen the role of citizens in decision-making. The limitations of digital participation are revealed or confirmed by this study. Digital technologies can mobilize more citizens, but at the same time reinforce existing inequalities. High-quality deliberation is also difficult to achieve through online platforms. This study shows that the approach applied by cities to digitalization impacts the level of democracy achieved. This should be useful to practitioners designing systems of citizen participation in other cities.

show abstract

The Systemic Turn and Participatory Budgeting: The Case of Rio Grande do Sul

Cited by 8 publications

References 33 publications

How does technological system design affect value creation? A systematic literature review of digital co-production

How does technological system design affect value creation? A systematic literature review of digital co-production

Displacement and Citizen Participation: A Comparison of the Enactment of E-Participation Platforms in Oslo and Madrid

The Impact of Digital Participation on Democratic Urban Governance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About