“…Although we applied external confining pressures P, of -1500 MPa during these experiments, we expect that the internal PH,o was still controlled by the Mg(OH) 2 + MgO + H 2 0 buffer yielding an effective contining pressure P. of -600 MPa at T = 800° C, where P. is given by P,-PH,o· Accepting that this assumption, that P, =I= P, 0181 fluid• is uncommon in studies of phase equilibria, the concept of effective pressure has been widely applied in rock mechanics studies [e.g., Hubbert and Willis, 1957; to be rapid, was out of equilibrium, we treat the effective pressure P. as a "partial pressure" of the solid phases [Fyfe et a/., 1978, p. 135]. In addition to these constant strain rate experiments using NaCl assemblies, we repeated mechanical tests of unjacketed Brazilian quartz samples using conventional talc assemblies after annealing (in talc) for times of 4 x 10 4 and 4 x 10 5 s. Because the kinetics of the dehydration reactions talc-+ anthophyllite + quartz + H 2 0 and anthophyllite -+ enstatite + quartz + H 2 0 are relatively slow [e.g., Greenwood, 1963], we expect that the PH,o• and thus P,, must vary with time for these experiments. In addition, as a result of the fluid's contact with the carbon furnace [French, 1966] and temperature gradients within the sample assembly, we cannot be certain of the values of PH,o• Pc"•' Pc 0 , Pc 02 , or P 0 , for these experiments.…”