2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(for comment ça va 'How's it going') and moi ('me') without the coreferential clitic je ('I') for the moment (cf. Haegeman 1997Haegeman , 2013 Much more intriguing for the 'reduced CP hypothesis' are fronted subject arguments (moi) with or without following adverbial adjuncts and no coreferential clitic subject in its canonical position (see example (17) Except for the moi-structures without coreferential je, the 'reduced CP hypothesis' for Written Subject Omission (WSO) of Haegeman (2013 and this volume) can be fully applied to subject omission in our corpus of French text messages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(for comment ça va 'How's it going') and moi ('me') without the coreferential clitic je ('I') for the moment (cf. Haegeman 1997Haegeman , 2013 Much more intriguing for the 'reduced CP hypothesis' are fronted subject arguments (moi) with or without following adverbial adjuncts and no coreferential clitic subject in its canonical position (see example (17) Except for the moi-structures without coreferential je, the 'reduced CP hypothesis' for Written Subject Omission (WSO) of Haegeman (2013 and this volume) can be fully applied to subject omission in our corpus of French text messages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Haegeman 1997, Weir 2012b The second explanation for subject drop in abbreviated registers is, unlike the preceding one, truly syntactic in nature and based on specific assumptions concerning the left periphery of sentences. Haegeman (2013and this volume) assumes, following Cardinaletti 2004and Rizzi and Shlonsky (2007, a functional projection SubjP above TP and TP-adjoined adverbials, where canonical sentence subjects are located. This projection is occasionally allowed to be the highest phase head of a sentence, i.e., the root phase (cf.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this smaller high-precision set of verbs, we collected tweets from a much larger corpus drawn from 1% sample over the period 2011-2013. One notable feature of the written English in social media is that sentence subjects can be optionally omitted. Subject-drop is a recognized feature of other informal spoken and written registers of English, particularly 'diary dialects' (Thrasher, 1977;Napoli, 1982;Haegeman and Ihsane, 2001;Weir, 2012;Haegeman, 2013;Scott, 2013). Because of the prevalence of subjectless cases we collected two sets of tweets: those matching the first person subject pattern I and those where the verb was tweet initial.…”
Section: Inducing Selectional Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this smaller high-precision set of verbs, we collected tweets from a much larger corpus drawn from 1% sample over the period 2011-2013. One notable feature of the written English in social media is that sentence subjects can be optionally omitted. Subject-drop is a recognized feature of other informal spoken and written registers of English, particularly 'diary dialects' (Thrasher, 1977;Napoli, 1982;Haegeman and Ihsane, 2001;Weir, 2012;Haegeman, 2013;Scott, 2013). Because of the prevalence of subjectless cases we collected two sets of tweets: those matching the first person subject pattern I and those where the verb was tweet initial.…”
Section: Inducing Selectional Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%