Papers of the Forty-Sixth Algonquian Conference
DOI: 10.14321/j.ctt1r33q1v.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Syntax of Medial Incorporation and Concrete Finals in Menominee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yucatec Maya differs sharply from the North American languages that productively use the extraction of attributive modifiers (demonstratives, quantifiers and adjectives) to left-peripheral positions for topics and foci; see e.g. Swampy Cree in Reinholtz (1999), Maliseet-Passamaquoddy in LeSourd (2004) and several Algonquian languages in Johnson & Rosen (2015). Yucatec Maya shares with these languages a rich verbal morphology and null arguments, which have been hypothesized as concomitants of the non-configurationality of these languages on a par with the discontinuity of NPs (see pronominal argument hypothesis by Jelinek 1984), but it turns out that this language disallows Left Branch Extraction – not a surprising fact given the presence of overt determiners (see Bošković 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yucatec Maya differs sharply from the North American languages that productively use the extraction of attributive modifiers (demonstratives, quantifiers and adjectives) to left-peripheral positions for topics and foci; see e.g. Swampy Cree in Reinholtz (1999), Maliseet-Passamaquoddy in LeSourd (2004) and several Algonquian languages in Johnson & Rosen (2015). Yucatec Maya shares with these languages a rich verbal morphology and null arguments, which have been hypothesized as concomitants of the non-configurationality of these languages on a par with the discontinuity of NPs (see pronominal argument hypothesis by Jelinek 1984), but it turns out that this language disallows Left Branch Extraction – not a surprising fact given the presence of overt determiners (see Bošković 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Maliseet) Transformational analyses of second-position enclitics in languages such as Serbian and Croatian (see Diesing and Zec 2017 for a recent study) typically suppose that clitics occupy a functional head in the left periphery of the clause and that either a word or a phrase is then moved into the specifier of this functional head. An analysis along these lines is proposed for several Algonquian languages, with a focus on Menominee (Wisconsin), by Johnson and Rosen (2015). More on their approach shortly.…”
Section: Second-position Enclitics In Maliseet-passamaquoddymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…corpse 'After a little while [the body] was heard to fall again.' (Passamaquoddy) Johnson and Rosen (2015) attribute all discontinuity in the expression of Algonquian phrases to movement, including cases in which a clitic is stationed between segments of a phrase. For Menominee, they assume that a second-position clitic occupies a functional head, typically the head of Topic Phrase or Focus Phrase, at the left periphery of the clause.…”
Section: Discontinuous Constituents: Two Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%