2017
DOI: 10.7557/1.6.2.4191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The syntax and semantics of nominal modifiers in Spanish: interpretations, types and ordering facts

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This article provides an overview of the main facts and theories regarding nominal modifiers, with attention to the internal division of the low DP-structure (gender, number and N). The article presents first the notion of modification seen from the perspectives of semantics and syntax ( §1); adjective classes are discussed in §2. §3 discusses the contrasts between prenominal and postnominal adjectives; §4 discusses the ordering of adjectives in sequences; §5 reviews the main theories that account f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPS-superlatives could also have prenominal DegPs in some contexts, but this would be a derived position for them, and it would not involve the same consequences as in a minimizer superlative. Cinque (2010) and Fábregas (2017) defend that a prenominal superlative DegP precisely breaks the well-known ambiguity between comparative and absolute readings of superlatives in favour of the latter 21 . Very roughly, what this means is that (44a)with postnominal DegP-could have the two readings in (44b, c), while (41a) -with prenominal DegP-only could have the absolute one:…”
Section: The Prenominal Degpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PPS-superlatives could also have prenominal DegPs in some contexts, but this would be a derived position for them, and it would not involve the same consequences as in a minimizer superlative. Cinque (2010) and Fábregas (2017) defend that a prenominal superlative DegP precisely breaks the well-known ambiguity between comparative and absolute readings of superlatives in favour of the latter 21 . Very roughly, what this means is that (44a)with postnominal DegP-could have the two readings in (44b, c), while (41a) -with prenominal DegP-only could have the absolute one:…”
Section: The Prenominal Degpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, we have seen that prenominal DegPs seem to be ungrammatical for other types of superlatives at first, although I have avoided to claim this as a generalization. In fact, Fábregas (2017) b. El más estricto reformatorio juvenil que existe the more strict reformatory juvenile that exist.3sg 'The strictest reformatory school that exists' c. En lo más alto de la más alta torre in the more high of the more high tower 'In the highest place of the highest tower'…”
Section: The Prenominal Degpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, el cocinero malo "the bad chef" has a non-intersective interpretation post-nominally, not because the post-nominal position is ambiguous, but because we generally refer to chefs in their roles as chefs. In contrast, post-nominal ambiguity approaches allow for both interpretations post-nominally (i.e., non-intersective/intersective, non-restrictive/restrictive) (Cinque 2010;Fábregas 2017;Martín 2009), while attributing a special, marked status to the pre-nominal position. A syntax void of post-nominal ambiguity could not, for example, account for the possibility that all Elena's classes are boring in las clases aburridas de Elena "Elena's boring classes" (Fábregas 2017, p. 28).…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors such as Demonte (1999) describes a smaller subset of ordering restrictions. Sánchez (1996Sánchez ( , 2017 goes a step further by proposing that, in Spanish, adjectives are not directly merged inside the nominal projection, but introduced as modifiers inside covert predicate structures (as predicates phrases or reduced relatives; see also Fábregas 2017). A consequence of this mode of derivation is greater flexibility in word order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%