The synergetic impact of manufacturing strategy development on operations-based non-financial performance

Liao, Chi-Horng; Tseng, Ming‐Lang; Lin, Yuan-Hsu; Ho, Poh Ling

doi:10.1109/ieem.2007.4419218

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(Frederick and Kuratko, 2010) together with technology compatibility (e.g. complications, manufacturing process) (Liao et al, 2007). The benefits were considered in terms of cost reduction and productivity (Coccia, 2003).…”

Section: Randd Commercialization Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

R & D commercialization capability criteria: implications for project selection

Karaveg

Thawesaengskulthai

Chandrachai

2016

Journal of Management Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the criteria of R & D commercialization capability by using the successful cases from government research institutes. Design/methodology/approach – The data were collected from 272 entrepreneurs and researchers with a structured questionnaire. The data analysis was carried out by the structural equation modeling (SEM). Findings – The research results revealed that there are six criteria for R & D project commercialization capability, these are arranged according to the significance; marketing, technology, finance, non-financial impact, intellectual property, and human resource. Moreover, the evaluator’s roles, both researchers and entrepreneurs, effect the level of criteria for consideration. Research limitations/implications – This research is derived from samples form voluntary participants from the disclosed lists in the governmental research institutes. Although SEM results provide weight for each R & D commercialization capability that would be the first step for developing the R & D evaluation instrument and the longitudinal will need to investigate. Practical implications – This study provides the holistic R & D commercialization capability criteria to assist entrepreneurs and researchers when faced with R & D commercialization decision. The criteria was developed from successful innovation cases; hence they enhance decision-making potential, provide a guideline of R & D commercialization evaluation process, speed up the decision-making process, and prevent risk of a resource meltdown and increase innovation exploitation. Social implications – The roles of the evaluators are important when considering R & D, hence, to use the same criteria for evaluating the researchers and entrepreneurs seems inappropriate since naturally, the researchers usually lack marketing and financial skills while the entrepreneurs usually lack technological skills and human resources. The answer may be in the form of providing specifics about project requirement, establishment of marketing and financial consultants in research institutes, enhancement of research and development division, or doing the business matching before doing the agreement in order to encourage co-research and increase the technology transfer level. Originality/value – This paper proposes the holistic criteria in order to decrease the ambiguous subjectivity of fuzzy-expert system and to help with effectively funding R & D and to prevent a resource meltdown.

show abstract

Section: Randd Commercialization Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

R & D commercialization capability criteria: implications for project selection

Karaveg

Thawesaengskulthai

Chandrachai

2016

Journal of Management Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…functional design, operating condition, and standardization) (Frederick & Kuratko, 2010) together with technology compatibility (e.g. complications, manufacturing process) (Liao et al, 2007) the benefits were considered by cost reduction and productivity (Coccia, 2003). The research failure on scale-up phases raises the need for assessing the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) which consists of nine levels from basic principle to successful operations (Graettinger et al, 2002;United States Department of Energy, 2011).…”

Section: Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

A combined technique using SEM and TOPSIS for the commercialization capability of R&D project evaluation

Karaveg¹,

Thawesaengskulthai²,

Chandrachai³

2015

10.5267/j.dsl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Impact from R&D project R&D do not only deliver tangible benefits such as data resource, universal network, and being the mechanism of knowledge transfer; therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of potentials should use financial performance with non-financial performance (NFP) (Kulatunga, Amaratunga, & Haigh, 2007). The evaluation of potentials for using NFP should evaluate continuous growth and learning processes (Tidd & Besssant, 2009), customers satisfaction (Cardinaels & Veen-Dirks, 2010), management capability, and high technology (Liao, Tseng, Lin, & Ho, 2007). Moreover, R&D evaluation can be used to follow the conduction of R&D projects as Project management (Kim & Oh, 2002;Kulatunga et al, 2011;Pillai, Joshi, & Rao, 2002;Stanley et al, 2010).…”

Section: Resourcementioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation model for research and development commercialization capability

Karaveg

Thawesaengskulthai

Chandrachai

2014

Production & Manufacturing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research is to study the research and development (R&D) commercial utilization situation, evaluation process situation, and identify criteria for commercialization capability in Thai Government research institutes. The data was collected by in-depth interviews and purposive sampling was deployed. A series of interviews were conducted with 14 Thai experts from all the eight Thai Government research institutes which stipulated R&D commercialization as their mission. The research results reveal that most of the Thai R&D institutes focus on basic research; hence, the developed technology does not fit to industry demand. This paper therefore suggests that the research institutes should set the research agenda based on market conditions together with technology drivers. To assess the commercialization capability, six criteria for R&D project commercialization capability are identified. These are: technology, marketing, finance, intellectual property, resource, and their beneficial impact, which should be considered but at different levels relating to the R&D development process. This paper is based on innovation theory to decrease the ambiguous subjectivity of Fuzzy expert systems. Moreover, the proposed model explains major criteria to be used at each R&D development process step to ensure commercialization capability exists.

show abstract

The synergetic impact of manufacturing strategy development on operations-based non-financial performance

Cited by 8 publications

References 15 publications

R & D commercialization capability criteria: implications for project selection

R & D commercialization capability criteria: implications for project selection

A combined technique using SEM and TOPSIS for the commercialization capability of R&D project evaluation

Evaluation model for research and development commercialization capability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About