2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00567.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Syndrome of Cardiac Tamponade with “Small” Pericardial Effusion

Abstract: Cardiac tamponade is usually a consequence of increased pericardial pressure with accumulation of pericardial effusion. Pericardial effusion may be caused by acute pericarditis, tumor, uremia, hypothyroidism, trauma, cardiac surgery, or other inflammatory/noninflammatory conditions. In this article we describe four scenarios illustrated by case reports where a small or apparently small pericardial effusion may produce cardiac tamponade. The first scenario illustrates how a small pericardial effusion can cause … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…During intrapleural fl uid infusion, intrapleural and intrapericardial pressures rose in the same manner (6). Subsequently, other case reports demonstrated the development of clinical echocardiographic and Doppler ultrasound signs of cardiac tamponade in patients with pleural eff usions and otherwise insignifi cant pericardial eff usions; drainage of pleural fl uid in these patients resulted in hemodynamic improvement (6)(7)(8)(9). As in our report, the tamponade physiology resolution after pleural eff usion drainage strongly suggests a direct and signifi cant eff ect of concomitant large pleural eff usions in addition to mild to moderate pericardial eff usions in causing tamponade as a severe hemodynamic complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…During intrapleural fl uid infusion, intrapleural and intrapericardial pressures rose in the same manner (6). Subsequently, other case reports demonstrated the development of clinical echocardiographic and Doppler ultrasound signs of cardiac tamponade in patients with pleural eff usions and otherwise insignifi cant pericardial eff usions; drainage of pleural fl uid in these patients resulted in hemodynamic improvement (6)(7)(8)(9). As in our report, the tamponade physiology resolution after pleural eff usion drainage strongly suggests a direct and signifi cant eff ect of concomitant large pleural eff usions in addition to mild to moderate pericardial eff usions in causing tamponade as a severe hemodynamic complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Typically small effusions accumulate quickly and tend to produce tamponade. Large effusions, on the other hand, undergo slow accumulation of fluid, thereby allowing the pericardial sac to expand 12. Treatment is by drainage of pus, which may be done by pericardiocentesis, surgical pericardial window or pericardiectomy, along with antibiotic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, non-complicated regional pericardial effusion or transudate as common adverse events after myocardial infarction could be difficult to be distinguished from pericarditis-related hemopericardium [10]. Traditional imaging modality like echocardiography is important for early detection and accurate diagnosis [11]. In this regard, characteristic description of the non-complicated regional pericardial fluid that helps differentiate the true "risky components" may help therapeutic strategy decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%