The symphony after Beethoven after Dahlhaus

Brodbeck, David

doi:10.1017/cco9781139021425.005

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 141 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One need not accept those conclusions unquestioningly (cf. Brodbeck, 2013), but the fact remains that 19th-century symphonists faced irreconcilable pressures to imbue normative models with novelty. Robert Schumann, for instance, was capable of exhorting composers, “Everything as in Beethoven,” only to conclude the same thought by describing the need “to advance [the modern symphony] according to new standards” (cited in Pederson, 1993, p. 20, emphasis added).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Contrast Principle, Typicality, and Cultural Longevity in 19th-Century Symphony Slow Movements: A Corpus Analysis

McDonald

Wöllner

2023

Music & Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The notion of contrast is integral to both aesthetic and psychological accounts of attention and interest. It therefore represents a useful heuristic for understanding contrasting slow movements in Western art music. Based on the observation from music theory that within-movement tonal contrast (mode and key) increased during the 19th century, we assumed that a corpus of symphonic slow movements ( n = 246) composed between 1800 and 1913 would exhibit increasing between-movement tonal contrast when compared to a sample of symphonies composed between 1757 and 1795 ( n = 141). Synchronic analysis confirmed that slow movements contrast with their key-defining first movements. Diachronic analysis confirmed that within-symphony tonal contrast increases after 1800. Each of five style parameters observed for era comparison (changes in use of mode, key, meter, form, and structure) conformed to musicologically distinct yet plausible historical boundaries. Cluster analysis of the post-1800 corpus generated three clusters, with mode (non-)match between slow movement and symphony, printed tempo marking, and key relationship (measured by tonal distance) as the three strongest predictors. Since discussions of style naturally raise questions of influence, we also examined the relationship between prototypicality and composer prominence. To that end, analysis of clusters suggests the possibility of multiple, distinct “Beethovenian prototypes.” Finally, we found that, with the exceptions of Beethoven and Brahms, the most statistically typical pieces lack enduring impact, from today's perspective. Conformity to general stylistic norms thus seems to predict against the cultural longevity of a 19th-century symphony.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Contrast Principle, Typicality, and Cultural Longevity in 19th-Century Symphony Slow Movements: A Corpus Analysis

McDonald

Wöllner

2023

Music & Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

To symfonier og et mysterium

Utne-Reitan

2020

SMN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bjørnar Utne-Reitan (b. 1994) is currently a doctoral research fellow at the Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo. He holds degrees in musicology and music theory from the University of Oslo and the Norwegian Academy of Music respectively. Currently, he is writing a PhD dissertation on the history of music theory education in Norway. Utne-Reitan has previously studied Edvard Grieg's music theory exercises from his time as a student at the Leipzig Conservatoire. This is his second published article in Studia Musicologica Norvegica.

show abstract

The symphony after Beethoven after Dahlhaus

Cited by 2 publications

References 141 publications

The Contrast Principle, Typicality, and Cultural Longevity in 19th-Century Symphony Slow Movements: A Corpus Analysis

The Contrast Principle, Typicality, and Cultural Longevity in 19th-Century Symphony Slow Movements: A Corpus Analysis

To symfonier og et mysterium

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About