2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is sensitive but non-specific in MS: Lexical access speed, memory, and information processing speed independently contribute to SDMT performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inasmuch as the drift rate parameter is a measure of processing speed, this leaves a considerable amount of variance unaccounted for. The weak to moderate relationship corroborates other research demonstrating processing speed inferences based exclusively on digit-symbol tests are largely invalid (Jaeger, 2018 ; Joy et al, 2003 ; Mui et al, 2022 ; Sandry et al, 2021 ; Treviño et al, 2021 ) and may more likely reflect multimodal integration (Sandry & Dobryakova, 2021 ). Low specificity does not undermine the value associated with a highly sensitive and quick screener afforded by digit-symbol assessments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Inasmuch as the drift rate parameter is a measure of processing speed, this leaves a considerable amount of variance unaccounted for. The weak to moderate relationship corroborates other research demonstrating processing speed inferences based exclusively on digit-symbol tests are largely invalid (Jaeger, 2018 ; Joy et al, 2003 ; Mui et al, 2022 ; Sandry et al, 2021 ; Treviño et al, 2021 ) and may more likely reflect multimodal integration (Sandry & Dobryakova, 2021 ). Low specificity does not undermine the value associated with a highly sensitive and quick screener afforded by digit-symbol assessments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Low specificity does not undermine the value associated with a highly sensitive and quick screener afforded by digit-symbol assessments. This does underscore the importance of follow-up assessment with precision instruments (Sandry et al, 2021 ), of which, response time models may be one viable approach (Mui et al, 2022 ). What will be even more informative is widespread application of computational modelling approaches, including the DDM, to quantify disease-related cognitive changes (Evans & Wagenmakers, 2019 ; Forstmann et al, 2016 ; Ratcliff et al, 2016 ; White et al, 2010 ; Wiecki et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 56–59 In Fabry disease such modular organization is enhanced, and, of note, in our sample was associated with worse working memory. This is not surprising, as we assessed working memory via a digit symbol coding task, that requires the involvement of different neuronal circuits responsible for distinct but partly overlapping cognitive processes (lexical access speed, memory and information processing speed), 60 and would thus likely be affected by the enhanced modular reorganization observed in Fabry disease. In agreement with this interpretation, previous studies have also highlighted a correlation between information processing speed, as measured via digit symbol coding, and WM integrity in Fabry disease, 13 sporadic cerebral small vessel disease, 61–64 and in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%