The Swedish fiscal policy framework and intermediate fiscal policy targets

Abstract

Summary Sweden is a front-runner in defining intermediate targets for fiscal policy (fiscal rules) as well as in setting up an independent fiscal council to monitor and comment on developments. Swedish public finances are among the most sound in the OECD having been able to consolidate public finances and ensure fiscal sustainability, and they have maintained room for fiscal manoeuvre also during the financial crisis. This paper takes a closer look at the Swedish case as the stepping stone for a more general discussion of how to set intermediate targets for fiscal policy and the role fiscal councils may have in strengthening political accountability and thus ultimately credibility of fiscal policy. The Swedish fiscal framework is compared to the fiscal compact for EU countries, and it is argued that it has a number of desirable features.

Second-Generation Fiscal Rules: Balancing Simplicity, Flexibility, and Enforceability

“…Rules can act as a commitment device, tying the hands of the government and limiting the use of fiscal discretion (Alesina and Tabellini 1990). For instance, to support fiscal consolidation following a financial crisis in the early 1990s, Sweden adopted an expenditure rule in 1997, which was successful at enforcing expenditure restraint and bringing down public debt (Andersen 2013). Rules can correct policymakers' incentives by raising the costs of excessive deficits, as noncompliance triggers reputational and electoral costs and, in some cases, sanctions.…”

The sustainability transition in Europe in an age of demographic and technological change

“…( 52) The Office for Budget Responsibility publishes fiscal sustainability reports annually, see OBR ( 2018). ( 53) See Andersen (2012), for a study linking the concept of fiscal sustainability to climate change, and Ekins and Speck (2014).…”