1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00401524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Swedish childhood diabetes study ? a multivariate analysis of risk determinants for diabetes in different age groups

Abstract: Summary.In a nationwide incident case-referent study stepwise univariate analysis has revealed several risk determinants for childhood diabetes mellitus. In a multivariate analysis we have determined the set of risk determinants that would independently predict childhood Type i (insulindependent) diabetes. Possible interactions between the risk determinants and differences in risk profiles with different ages at onset were also examined. Reported familial insulintreated and non-insulin-treated diabetes were si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
2
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
7
68
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These include viral infections [39][40][41], dietary factors (cow's milk, nitrosamines, high protein intake) [42,43], neonatal jaundice and ABO incompatibility [44], neonatal respiratory disease [44], early supplementary milk-based feeding, short time of breast-feeding [42,45] and stress events such as severe life events [42,46,47]. Several studies have found that children who later develop diabetes have a higher BW than controls, and also have an increased linear growth in childhood [15,16,42,48,49]. Our finding that HLA genetic factors, which are associated with susceptibility for type 1 diabetes, are related to intrauterine growth might in fact contribute to the increased BW in type 1 diabetes children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include viral infections [39][40][41], dietary factors (cow's milk, nitrosamines, high protein intake) [42,43], neonatal jaundice and ABO incompatibility [44], neonatal respiratory disease [44], early supplementary milk-based feeding, short time of breast-feeding [42,45] and stress events such as severe life events [42,46,47]. Several studies have found that children who later develop diabetes have a higher BW than controls, and also have an increased linear growth in childhood [15,16,42,48,49]. Our finding that HLA genetic factors, which are associated with susceptibility for type 1 diabetes, are related to intrauterine growth might in fact contribute to the increased BW in type 1 diabetes children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several studies have reported that gestational infections might represent a risk factor for T1D development [4][5][6]. In contrast, exposure to maternal diabetes in utero has been suggested to represent a protective factor for the offspring during the first two decades of life [5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several studies have reported that gestational infections might represent a risk factor for T1D development [4][5][6]. In contrast, exposure to maternal diabetes in utero has been suggested to represent a protective factor for the offspring during the first two decades of life [5,7]. This finding is reinforced by studies indicating that children born before maternal diabetes onset have a higher risk of developing diabetes than children who are born after the onset of maternal diabetes [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither the causes of the condition, nor the causes of the increased incidence are known. Although a genetic predisposition is clearly of great importance, direct epidemiological evidence from case-control studies [3,4] and indirect epidemiological evidence from migrant studies [5,6] indicate that environmental agents are also very important.The descriptive epidemiology of Type i diabetes is an important source of information for the framing of aetiological hypotheses. Several prominent features require explanation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%