2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(00)00033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SWAN model used to study wave evolution in a flume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value 0.8 is not the default. However, it is within the range proposed by Battjes and Stive (1985) and close to the values 0.78 of Wood et al (2001). In fact, this value 0.8 was chosen for closer results to the measurements after some trial and error tests.…”
Section: Model Setupsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This value 0.8 is not the default. However, it is within the range proposed by Battjes and Stive (1985) and close to the values 0.78 of Wood et al (2001). In fact, this value 0.8 was chosen for closer results to the measurements after some trial and error tests.…”
Section: Model Setupsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…SWAN simulations accounted for non-linear triad wavewave interactions, as they are rather important in shallow coastal areas (Booij et al, 1999;Holthuijsen, 2007), for bottom friction dissipation using the default variable JONSWAP expression according to Hasselmann et al (1973) and for breaking dissipation according to the default bore-based model of Battjes and Janssen (1978). A depth-induced wave breaking parameter (γ) of 0.78 was chosen, as this is a commonly accepted value of γ (Ranasinghe et al, 2004), and was verified by dedicated tests on SWAN performance by Wood et al (2001).…”
Section: Nearshore Wave Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes and the subsequent changes in the wave height distribution have to be simulated in order to obtain the distribution just in front of the defence line. Generally, wave models such as SWAN (Wood et al 2000), Boussinesq models (Bayram & Larson, 2000) and Volume of Fluid (VOF) models (Wu et al 1994) are used for this purpose. The difficulty, however, consists in assessing the associated uncertainties which are required for the implementation of any PRA-based design of coastal flood defences.…”
Section: Uncertainties In Predicting Waves Over Shallow Foreshoresmentioning
confidence: 99%