1972
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/125.3.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to 24 Antibiotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
17
0
11

Year Published

1973
1973
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
17
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results confirm that clindamycin is the drug of choice as suggested by the in-vitro studies of Ingham et al (1968), Kislak (1972), and the report of Tracy et al (1972). Other antibiotics may be useful, however, especially erythromycin and lincomycin, which may be given parenterally as well as by mouth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results confirm that clindamycin is the drug of choice as suggested by the in-vitro studies of Ingham et al (1968), Kislak (1972), and the report of Tracy et al (1972). Other antibiotics may be useful, however, especially erythromycin and lincomycin, which may be given parenterally as well as by mouth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The strains of Bacteroides reported here were resistant to penicillin and ampicillin, therefore other antibiotics should be used to treat the infections. Our results confirm that clindamycin is the drug of choice as suggested by the in-vitro studies of Ingham et al (1968), Kislak (1972), and the report of Tracy et al (1972). Other antibiotics may be useful, however, especially erythromycin and lincomycin, which may be given parenterally as well as by mouth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Ingham, Selkon, Codd, and Hale (1970) showed that 0 3 ,ug-1 25 ,g clindamycin was bactericidal to strains of B. fragilis. The high sensitivity of bacteroides to clindamycin and to a slightly lesser extent, the parent compound, lincomycin, has been confirmed by Kislak (1972), Bodner et al (1972), andMartin, Gardner, andWashington (1972). In this series only one of 1067 strains tested was found to be resistant to clindamycin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%