1951
DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400044120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The survival of bacteria during and after drying

Abstract: An investigation of the survival rate of bacteria after drying in vacuo by the ' spin–freeze' method showed that one of the most important factors was the fluid in which the bacteria were suspended. Broth or nutrient gelatin gave a moderate survival rate, but in various other protein solutions, even though there might be a fair survival immediately after drying, a large fall occurred in the viable count after storage. The addition of glucose to the suspending fluid in concentrations of between 5 and 10% greatl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
1

Year Published

1954
1954
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(9 reference statements)
5
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…at 37" on casein hydrolysate yeast extract (CCY) agar (Gladstone & Fildes, 1940) was suspended in 50 ml. glucose serum broth (Fry & Greaves, 1951) and freeze-dried in 5 ml. batches.…”
Section: Organisms and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at 37" on casein hydrolysate yeast extract (CCY) agar (Gladstone & Fildes, 1940) was suspended in 50 ml. glucose serum broth (Fry & Greaves, 1951) and freeze-dried in 5 ml. batches.…”
Section: Organisms and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We a q much indebted to Dr R. M. Fry for supplying us with a culture of the paracolon bacillus (D. 201 H) used by Fry & Greaves (1951); also to the Agricultural Research Council for support during this work.…”
Section: R C Valentine and J R G Bradfieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume of broth used by these workers has varied from less than 5 to more than 100 times the volume of the water removed. Fry & Greaves (1951) rehydrated their cultures with 100 volumes of Ringer solution, Mazur & Weston (1956) used 2 or 3 drops of a dilute detergent solution for an unspecified amount of dry matter, and Hutton, Hilmoe & Roberts (1951) used an unspecified volume of dilute tryptose solution. Wasserman & Hopkins (1957) rehydrated their preparations with dilute solutions, using c. 0.5 ml./mg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%