2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2390827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Surprisingly Swift Decline of U.S. Manufacturing Employment

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 In prior research (Pierce and Schott (2016)), we show that goods more exposed to PNTR exhibit substantial relative increases in U.S. imports from China as well as the number of U.S. rms that import from China, the number of Chinese rms that export to the United States, and the number of U.S.-Chinese rm pairs engaged in a trading relationship. One interpretation of these outcomes is that they are the manifestation of investment in trading relationships that was unleashed by the elimination of cost uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…2 In prior research (Pierce and Schott (2016)), we show that goods more exposed to PNTR exhibit substantial relative increases in U.S. imports from China as well as the number of U.S. rms that import from China, the number of Chinese rms that export to the United States, and the number of U.S.-Chinese rm pairs engaged in a trading relationship. One interpretation of these outcomes is that they are the manifestation of investment in trading relationships that was unleashed by the elimination of cost uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…() find that increased exposure to Chinese imports is negatively associated with the share of workers employed in the manufacturing sector. Similarly, Pierce and Schott () find that US manufacturing employment declined considerably as a result of the granting of permanent normal trade relations to China in 2000.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is told in a large and growing literature on the job losses in US manufacturing from the China Trade Shock of the 2000s. 18 The main cause of the shock, according to this literature, was the granting of PNTR by the USA to China upon the latter's accession to the WTO in 2001 (Pierce and Schott 2012;Autor et al 2016a). How would the granting of PNTR have generated a trade shock capable of destroying in less than one decade 2.4 million American jobs, given that China had enjoyed Most Favored Nation (MFN) status in the US market (albeit conditional on an annual renewal) since 1980?…”
Section: The Other Side Of the Storymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…How would the granting of PNTR have generated a trade shock capable of destroying in less than one decade 2.4 million American jobs, given that China had enjoyed Most Favored Nation (MFN) status in the US market (albeit conditional on an annual renewal) since 1980? The answer, according to Pierce and Schott (2012) is that, with the granting of PNTR, foreign and domestic firms producing for export to the USA no longer faced uncertainty about US tariff rates that would apply were MFN not renewed annually. In consequence:…”
Section: The Other Side Of the Storymentioning
confidence: 99%