2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The surgical management of facial trauma in British soldiers during combat operations in Afghanistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some British authors stated that wounds should be cleaned, decontaminated and repaired by delayed primary closure 11 16 18. However, a comprehensive review of all British military facial injuries identified that debridement and primary direct closure under antibiotic cover failed to show any cases of postoperative infection 12. The use of both internal and external fixation techniques for maxillofacial fractures was described by British and American military surgeons for the early management of ballistic wounds 9 10 17 18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some British authors stated that wounds should be cleaned, decontaminated and repaired by delayed primary closure 11 16 18. However, a comprehensive review of all British military facial injuries identified that debridement and primary direct closure under antibiotic cover failed to show any cases of postoperative infection 12. The use of both internal and external fixation techniques for maxillofacial fractures was described by British and American military surgeons for the early management of ballistic wounds 9 10 17 18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Lawnick et al [8] noted that MCIS showed superior performance compared with AIS because its source was rooted in combat injury databases. In addition, Wordsworth et al [10] concluded that AIS cannot predict the need for reconstructive surgery for combat-related maxillofacial injuries. The development of MCIS and MFIS included five combat body regions, injury severity along a five-point scale, injury descriptions for a spectrum of combat-related injuries, and injury description codes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no statistically significant difference between the HEED and LBW groups with regard to MCIS scores (p=0.206). Wordsworth et al [10] concluded that the maxillofacial region is commonly injured during blasts. Similarly, in this study on modern conflicts, which occur in narrow places and near urban areas, maxillofacial and cervical injuries are commonly observed because of the use of HEEDs like IEDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The UK deployed surgeons formally trained in the management of facial trauma to the R3 MTF in Camp Bastion and, for a shorter period, to the Canadian-led R3 MTF in Kandahar 6–9. Taught British practice was to repatriate patients with facial injury without stabilisation or fixation of the facial skeleton to the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM) in Birmingham UK (role 4) 6 7 10–13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%