2017
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/53/1/012010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The surface waves-based seismic exploration of soil and ground water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rayleigh wave exploration based on ambient noise is an important method for investigating near-surface shear wave velocity (V S ) structures. It is widely used in fundamental geological surveys [1,2], geotechnical engineering [3], geological hazard early warning [4,5], hydrogeological surveys [6], and other fields. In particular, it has incomparable advantages for urban subsurface surveying and measuring the VS of weakly consolidated soils in offshore areas because other geophysical methods are easily susceptible to noise [7] or do not allow for borehole testing to be carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rayleigh wave exploration based on ambient noise is an important method for investigating near-surface shear wave velocity (V S ) structures. It is widely used in fundamental geological surveys [1,2], geotechnical engineering [3], geological hazard early warning [4,5], hydrogeological surveys [6], and other fields. In particular, it has incomparable advantages for urban subsurface surveying and measuring the VS of weakly consolidated soils in offshore areas because other geophysical methods are easily susceptible to noise [7] or do not allow for borehole testing to be carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the inversion of surface wave dispersion curves to obtain shear‐wave velocity (VS) profiles, which is a key step in the multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) (Park et al ., 1999; Socco et al ., 2010b). MASW is widely employed for noninvasive geotechnical site investigations (Strobbia et al ., 2010; Mahvelati and Coe, 2017; Serdyukov et al ., 2017; Rahman et al ., 2018) and can be applied to the estimation of statics corrections, which can increase the accuracy of deep reservoir exploration by seismic reflection data (Socco et al ., 2010a; Roohollah, 2013). Surface wave analysis is the preferred method for shallow subsurface time‐lapse four‐dimensional (4D) monitoring (Ikeda et al ., 2018), which is particularly important because of the growing demand for CO2 monitoring during the injection and storage of CO2 in carbon capture projects (White, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rayleigh wave measurements are highly sensitive to S‐wave velocity ( Vs ) and hence the multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) (Park et al ., 1999; Socco and Strobbia, 2004; Foti et al ., 2018) is widely employed for near‐surface investigations (Xia et al ., 2003; Lai, 2005; Strobbia et al ., 2010; Serdyukov et al ., 2017; Rahman et al ., 2018; Cercato et al ., 2020) and also for statics corrections in deep seismic exploration (Socco et al ., 2010). Well‐established inversion methods rely on dispersion curve inversion under the assumption of a one‐dimensional (1D) subsurface structure (Dal Moro et al ., 2007; Socco and Boiero, 2008; Maraschini and Foti, 2010; Cercato, 2011; Di Giulio et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%