1937
DOI: 10.1109/jrproc.1937.228927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Surface Wave in Radio Propagation over Plane Earth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1937
1937
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental verification of the Sommerfeld theory is not extensive, probably because it is so well established theoretically for the FR, in which it has been verified only with continuous waves and vertical polarization. Burrows (1937) confirmed the finite conductive earth theory at 150 MHz over a low conductivity, σ, lake (ε′ = 81) with vertical polarization; 1/R 2 behavior began at approximately the 100-m range. The scale model experiments reported in King and Wait (1976) also found 1/R 2 dependence for vertical polarization and conductive surfaces from the NR to the FR near 5 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Experimental verification of the Sommerfeld theory is not extensive, probably because it is so well established theoretically for the FR, in which it has been verified only with continuous waves and vertical polarization. Burrows (1937) confirmed the finite conductive earth theory at 150 MHz over a low conductivity, σ, lake (ε′ = 81) with vertical polarization; 1/R 2 behavior began at approximately the 100-m range. The scale model experiments reported in King and Wait (1976) also found 1/R 2 dependence for vertical polarization and conductive surfaces from the NR to the FR near 5 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The field expressed by these equations, widely confirmed by measurements [11] is commonly called a Norton Surface Wave. Its attenuation with the distance is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Norton Surface Wavementioning
confidence: 86%
“…The existence of a pole contribution in the final solution of Sommerfeld integrals in (1) is a very controversial issue which was experimentally proven wrong in [12]. The association of this pole to SP adds unnecessary confusion to the subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He directed his reader to the book by Stratton on electromagnetics [6], which is a very classical book on electromagnetic theory. Ritchie Sommerfeld was proven wrong in this point by experiment [12] and extensive theoretical analysis [13]. It is important to stress here that the error is much more serious than the famous sign error which is actually a myth [13].…”
Section: History Of Sp and Its Relation To Surface Wavesmentioning
confidence: 92%