1992
DOI: 10.1016/0278-4343(92)90063-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The surface accumulation of larval fishes by hydrodynamic convergence within the Mississippi River plume front

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Densities of larval fishes in frontal zones are commonly greater than in adjacent water masses, although specific distributions vary considerably among taxa (Kiørboe et al 1988, Grimes & Finucane 1991, Kingsford et al 1991, Govoni & Grimes 1992, Munk et al 1995, Kingsford & Suthers 1996a, Sabatés & Olivar 1996, Lochmann et al 1997. Plausible mechanisms for the generation and maintenance of elevated densities of larval fishes at fronts include (1) concentrated spawning in frontal zones (Shelton & Hutchings 1982), (2) concentration of larvae by hydrodynamic convergence at fronts (Govoni & Grimes 1992, Lochmann et al 1997, and (3) improved feeding success, condition and growth deriving from elevated productivity at fronts (Munk 1993, Lang et al 1994, St John & Lund 1996see Powell et al 1990 for an exception) which might abbreviate periods of vulnerability to predation (Meekan & Fortier 1996). However, notwithstanding the potential benefits for larvae at fronts of improved feeding success and partial protection in a dense field of alternative prey (Kean-Howie et al 1988), increased predation intensity by planktivores that aggregate at fronts (Taggart et al 1989, Sims & Quayle 1998 can easily counteract any trophic benefits (Grimes & Kingsford 1996, Grimes 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Densities of larval fishes in frontal zones are commonly greater than in adjacent water masses, although specific distributions vary considerably among taxa (Kiørboe et al 1988, Grimes & Finucane 1991, Kingsford et al 1991, Govoni & Grimes 1992, Munk et al 1995, Kingsford & Suthers 1996a, Sabatés & Olivar 1996, Lochmann et al 1997. Plausible mechanisms for the generation and maintenance of elevated densities of larval fishes at fronts include (1) concentrated spawning in frontal zones (Shelton & Hutchings 1982), (2) concentration of larvae by hydrodynamic convergence at fronts (Govoni & Grimes 1992, Lochmann et al 1997, and (3) improved feeding success, condition and growth deriving from elevated productivity at fronts (Munk 1993, Lang et al 1994, St John & Lund 1996see Powell et al 1990 for an exception) which might abbreviate periods of vulnerability to predation (Meekan & Fortier 1996). However, notwithstanding the potential benefits for larvae at fronts of improved feeding success and partial protection in a dense field of alternative prey (Kean-Howie et al 1988), increased predation intensity by planktivores that aggregate at fronts (Taggart et al 1989, Sims & Quayle 1998 can easily counteract any trophic benefits (Grimes & Kingsford 1996, Grimes 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…behaviourally mediated concentration in the presence of convergence zones (Okubo, 1978;Olson and Backus, 1985;Franks 1992;Govoni and Grimes, 1992); close association with thermal gradients (Ortner et al, 1980;1981;Magnuson et al, 1981); orientation to density discontinuities (Murav'yev and Shirshov, 1984) or abundance of food (Bowman and Esaias, 1978;Crowder and Magnuson, 1983). Interpreting zooplankton distributions can be further complicated by zooplankton behaviour such as diel migration (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been observed to accumulate at oceanic frontal boundaries [32], where small predatory fish are also more abundant [33]. Thus, successful predator evasion is essential to the copepod's survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%