2014
DOI: 10.1107/s160057671401927x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The suppression of fluorescence peaks in energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction

Abstract: Author(s) of this paper may load this reprint on their own web site or institutional repository provided that this cover page is retained. Republication of this article or its storage in electronic databases other than as specified above is not permitted without prior permission in writing from the IUCr.For further information see http://journals.iucr.org/services/authorrights.html Many research topics in condensed matter research, materials science and the life sciences make use of crystallographic methods to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 which shows three EDXRD spectra of a limestone rock specimen, recorded at different locations on the same sample, and the spectrum of a pressedpowder pellet made from a portion of the same rock. This limestone contains calcite, dolomite and minor quartz [see Hansford et al (2014), referred to as limestone A in that paper]. The diffraction peaks in the spectrum of the pellet are clearly broader, indicating the introduction of crystallite size and/or lattice strain effects during the pulverization and milling of the rock sample.…”
Section: Microstructural Effects On Peak Widthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 which shows three EDXRD spectra of a limestone rock specimen, recorded at different locations on the same sample, and the spectrum of a pressedpowder pellet made from a portion of the same rock. This limestone contains calcite, dolomite and minor quartz [see Hansford et al (2014), referred to as limestone A in that paper]. The diffraction peaks in the spectrum of the pellet are clearly broader, indicating the introduction of crystallite size and/or lattice strain effects during the pulverization and milling of the rock sample.…”
Section: Microstructural Effects On Peak Widthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore essentially a reflection-mode, surfaceanalysis XRD method, with typical penetration depths of a few microns. The 2011 paper considered the technique from a theoretical standpoint and with the aid of ray-trace modelling whereas subsequent work proved the claims experimentally (Hansford, 2013) and demonstrated a method to suppress fluorescence peaks in order to uncover overlapped diffraction peaks (Hansford et al, 2014). All published work on this technique to date has focused on essentially low-resolution methods using solid-state X-ray detectors [silicon drift detectors (SDDs) and charge-coupled devices (CCDs)] to provide the energy dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument applies energy-dispersive XRD (EDXRD) in a back-reflection geometry which has the unique characteristic of insensitivity to sample morphology (Hansford 2011), opening the possibility of analysis of unprepared samples. This technique has been proven experimentally in a laboratory configuration (Hansford 2013;Hansford et al 2014) and, more recently, the first prototype of a handheld instrument has been produced by modification of a Bruker Tracer handheld X-ray fluorescence (XRF) device. The instrument yields XRF information about the sample in addition to diffraction data.…”
Section: Handheld Xrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental setup for the results presented in this paper was very similar to those reported by Hansford (2013) and Hansford et al (2014). This setup employs an in-house X-ray tube with a Cu anode and an e2v CCD-22 (Burrows et al, 2005) charge-coupled detector, which has an open-electrode structure for enhanced low-energy quantum efficiency.…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For some data sets, an attenuating filter was mounted either in the X-ray beam between the source and sample or in front of the CCD; full details are given with the description of each data set. These filters were used in addition to the polyimide/Al filter reported by Hansford et al (2014). The aperture between the source and sample was either 2 or 3 mm in diameter for the data sets reported here.…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%