2013
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hht020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Supply of Corporate Directors and Board Independence

Abstract: Empirical evidence on the relations between board independence and key board decisions, CEO incentives and firm performance is generally confounded by major endogeneity issues. We circumvent these endogeneity problems by demonstrating the strong impact of the local director labor market on corporate board structure for all but the largest quartile of S&P 1500 firms. Specifically, we show that proximity to larger pools of local director talent leads to significantly more independent boards. Using local director… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
293
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 573 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
19
293
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, Knyazeva et al (2013) show that director labor market is highly localized. As industries tend to be geographically localized, we measure the supply of EEDs by identifying and summing all EEDs in every 2-digit SIC codes.…”
Section: Endogenous Eed Appointment and Network Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, Knyazeva et al (2013) show that director labor market is highly localized. As industries tend to be geographically localized, we measure the supply of EEDs by identifying and summing all EEDs in every 2-digit SIC codes.…”
Section: Endogenous Eed Appointment and Network Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for each firm, the instrumental variable is specified as the number of other companies with which the firm shares the same first 3 digits of the zip code of the corporate headquarters location and the same 2-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code but not the same 4-digit SIC code. This variable is intended to capture the potential supply of local director candidates with relevant industry experience and is based on the following stylized facts about the director-firm matching process: i) there is a strong local component to the director labor market, in the sense that director candidates are more likely to join geographically proximate firms (Knyazeva, Knyazeva, and Masulis (2013)); ii) executive experience is a typical background for outside directors (Linck, Netter, and Yang (2008)); and iii) firms are unlikely to invite executives from direct competitors to serve on their boards. We expect that firms located close to a larger number of noncompeting industry peers are more likely to have a greater presence of independent directors with relevant industry experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the research evidence on the effectiveness of independent directors is not a clear cut, indicating both positive and negative aspects of this role in regards to firm's financial performance (e.g. Bhagat and Black [66], Knyazeva et al [67], etc). Also, the percentage of serving independent directors varies greatly across various states.…”
Section: Modelling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%