1996
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.135.6.1853
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sup-pf-2 mutations of Chlamydomonas alter the activity of the outer dynein arms by modification of the gamma-dynein heavy chain.

Abstract: Abstract. The sup-p f-2 mutation is a member of a group of dynein regulatory mutations that are capable of restoring motility to paralyzed central pair or radial spoke defective strains. Previous work has shown that the flagellar beat frequency is reduced in sup-pf-2, but little else was known about the sup-pf-2 phenotype (Huang, B

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, Chlamydomonas pf mutants, which lack the spokes and/or CP, are motile if they also carry a suppressor mutation (Brokaw et al, 1982;Huang et al, 1982;Porter et al, 1992). Some of the suppressor mutations lead to defects in the regulatory chains of both inner and outer dyneins (Porter et al, 1992;Porter et al, 1994;Rupp et al, 1996). Other mutations cause the absence of regulatory proteins and/or dynein subsets (Piperno et al, 1994;Piperno, 1995;Rupp et al, 1996).…”
Section: Dynein I1 and The Role Of The Cp-spoke Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, Chlamydomonas pf mutants, which lack the spokes and/or CP, are motile if they also carry a suppressor mutation (Brokaw et al, 1982;Huang et al, 1982;Porter et al, 1992). Some of the suppressor mutations lead to defects in the regulatory chains of both inner and outer dyneins (Porter et al, 1992;Porter et al, 1994;Rupp et al, 1996). Other mutations cause the absence of regulatory proteins and/or dynein subsets (Piperno et al, 1994;Piperno, 1995;Rupp et al, 1996).…”
Section: Dynein I1 and The Role Of The Cp-spoke Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional support is provided by the analysis of suppressor mutations that restore motility to both radial spoke and central apparatus defective mutants without restoring the missing structures (49). These mutations occur in genes encoding heavy chains of outer dynein arms (49)(50)(51). One mutation, sup-pf-2, is in the gene encoding the ␥ heavy chain subunit (51) and results in the asymmetric assembly of the outer dynein arms on subsets of doublet microtubules.…”
Section: In High Calcium the Central Apparatus Is Randomly Oriented Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mutations occur in genes encoding heavy chains of outer dynein arms (49)(50)(51). One mutation, sup-pf-2, is in the gene encoding the ␥ heavy chain subunit (51) and results in the asymmetric assembly of the outer dynein arms on subsets of doublet microtubules. Although the sup-pf-2 mutation restores motility to mutants lacking the radial spokes or central apparatus, flagella of these double mutants beat with a predominantly symmetric waveform (49,52,53).…”
Section: In High Calcium the Central Apparatus Is Randomly Oriented Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bypass mutations are thought to identify components in the signal transduction pathway between the central pair/ radial spoke structures and the dynein arms. Characterization of the bypass mutations has identified defects in genes encoding components of the outer dynein arms (Huang et al, 1982;Porter et al, 1994;Rupp et al, 1996), the inner dynein arms Myster et al, 1997), and the dynein regulatory complex (Huang et al, 1982;Piperno et al, 1992). These and other studies suggest that the central pair microtubules regulate dynein arm activity through a signal transduction cascade that involves the radial spokes and the dynein regulatory complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Complementation tests were performed by constructing stable diploid cell lines using the complementing arg2 and arg7 markers (Ebersold, 1967). Assessment of motility phenotypes and measurements of swimming velocity were performed as previously described (Rupp et al, 1996). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%