1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1978.tb01494.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sulpiride Test in Panhypopituitarism

Abstract: SUMMARY The results obtained with a new test of prolactin (PRL) release in six panhypo‐pituitary patients as compared to fourteen normal subjects (eight females and six males) are presented. The test consists of the i.m. administration of 100 mg of sulphide and the measurement of plasma PRL by a double antibody radio‐immunoassay techniques at −15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 min. Mean baseline PRL values were not significantly different in the three groups. After sulpiride a 800–4200% increment of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A gross blunting of responsiveness was apparent on the second day of each test period throughout the study. Batrinos et al (1978) reported that the response of PRL to sulpiride stimulation was greater than that reported following other provocation tests of this hormone. Repeated sulpiride stimulation was reported to give a comparable PRL response at a ten day interval and a higher response at a five day interval.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A gross blunting of responsiveness was apparent on the second day of each test period throughout the study. Batrinos et al (1978) reported that the response of PRL to sulpiride stimulation was greater than that reported following other provocation tests of this hormone. Repeated sulpiride stimulation was reported to give a comparable PRL response at a ten day interval and a higher response at a five day interval.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The details of the test are described in the preceding paper (Batrinos et al, 1978). Statistical evaluation of the results was made by the Wilcoxon-White test (Snedecor & Cochran, 1967).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%