2008
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-097022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sugar-binding ability of ERGIC-53 is enhanced by its interaction with MCFD2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(59 reference statements)
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These mutations cause amino acid substitutions in the first EF-hand motif (D81Yand D89A) and the second EF-hand motif (D122V, D129E, Y135N, and I136T/V). All the mutations except for Y135N have already been tested for in vitro and/or in vivo interactions with ERGIC-53 and shown to result in impaired binding (3,10,12,17). The present study also confirmed the negative effects of these mutations on the binding capability to ERGIC-53-CRD (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These mutations cause amino acid substitutions in the first EF-hand motif (D81Yand D89A) and the second EF-hand motif (D122V, D129E, Y135N, and I136T/V). All the mutations except for Y135N have already been tested for in vitro and/or in vivo interactions with ERGIC-53 and shown to result in impaired binding (3,10,12,17). The present study also confirmed the negative effects of these mutations on the binding capability to ERGIC-53-CRD (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…By contrast, the product of MCFD2 is a soluble luminal protein with two EF-hand Ca 2þ -binding motifs (9). It has been shown that MCFD2 interacts with the CRD of ERGIC-53 in a Ca 2þ -dependent manner (9)(10)(11). Accumulating evidence indicates that this complex recycles between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) and thereby functions as a cargo receptor in the early secretory pathway of FV and FVIII (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding constant for CRD and MCFD2 is 1.6 Â 10 8 M [6] and for CRD and N-terminal truncated MCFD2 in the same order (unpublished data) so the limited 850 Å 2 surface area buried upon complex formation is surprising. The binding of MCFD2 does not induce any major structural changes in the CRD and thus it most probably acts as co-receptor in the transport of FV and FVIII by direct interaction with cargo rather than through modulation of the binding of cargo to the CRD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FVIII interacts with the LMAN1/MCFD2 complex, while the B-domain deleted form of FVIII exhibits reduced binding [5]. LMAN1/MCFD2 complex formation and FVIII binding are calcium ion dependent [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory mechanisms may incorporate pH or Ca 2ϩ gradients that exist between lumenal compartments of the early secretory pathway (44,45). Indeed biochemical studies on interactions between the ERGIC-53 cargo receptor and high mannose glycoproteins indicated that binding affinity is influenced by both pH and Ca 2ϩ concentrations in correlation with intracellular gradients (35,46). Alternatively clustering of cargo receptors by COPII coat subunits at ER exit sites could increase receptor affinities for cargo and then reverse ligand binding upon vesicle uncoating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%