1972
DOI: 10.2307/2799954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Succession of Solomon: A Reply to Edmund Leach's Essay 'The Legitimacy of Solomon'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16-20) tend to include relatively clear and reasonable theories, they often are fo und, upon careful examination, to be based on fa ulty data and incorrect fa cts (cf 19,46,55,111). That is, even though Leach's own structuralist analyses (74-77; 80, pp.…”
Section: My Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16-20) tend to include relatively clear and reasonable theories, they often are fo und, upon careful examination, to be based on fa ulty data and incorrect fa cts (cf 19,46,55,111). That is, even though Leach's own structuralist analyses (74-77; 80, pp.…”
Section: My Thmentioning
confidence: 99%