1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63424-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Subunit Structure and Subunit Interactions of Cytidine Triphosphate Synthetase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observations indicate that GSA competitively inhibits the ammonia-dependent activity of CTP synthase by binding at a distinct glutamine site whose affinity for glutamine is altered by the presence of GTP. It seems unlikely that the binding of GSA and the formation of the thiohemiacetal sterically blocks access to the ammonia site because covalent modification by the glutamine analogue 6-diazo-5-oxonorleucine (DON), which is larger than either glutamine or GSA by a methylene group, does not block access to the ammonia site [15]. A more plausible explanation is that reaction of GSA at the glutamine site to form the thiohemiacetal induces a conformational change that prevents exogenous ammonia from reaching its site of reaction in a manner similar to that of either glutamylated enzyme or the tetrahedral intermediates generated during glutamine hydrolysis (Scheme 4B).…”
Section: Inhibition Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our observations indicate that GSA competitively inhibits the ammonia-dependent activity of CTP synthase by binding at a distinct glutamine site whose affinity for glutamine is altered by the presence of GTP. It seems unlikely that the binding of GSA and the formation of the thiohemiacetal sterically blocks access to the ammonia site because covalent modification by the glutamine analogue 6-diazo-5-oxonorleucine (DON), which is larger than either glutamine or GSA by a methylene group, does not block access to the ammonia site [15]. A more plausible explanation is that reaction of GSA at the glutamine site to form the thiohemiacetal induces a conformational change that prevents exogenous ammonia from reaching its site of reaction in a manner similar to that of either glutamylated enzyme or the tetrahedral intermediates generated during glutamine hydrolysis (Scheme 4B).…”
Section: Inhibition Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more plausible explanation is that reaction of GSA at the glutamine site to form the thiohemiacetal induces a conformational change that prevents exogenous ammonia from reaching its site of reaction in a manner similar to that of either glutamylated enzyme or the tetrahedral intermediates generated during glutamine hydrolysis (Scheme 4B). Such major conformational changes are induced by DON and glutamine [15,37] and are believed to give rise to the ' half-of-the-sites ' reactivity observed when DON reacts with only half of the total glutamine sites yet abolishes all of the glutamine activity of the enzyme and leaves the ammonia activity intact [37]. Distinct differences between the native, glutamylated and DON-modified enzyme have been demonstrated by their differing reactivities towards 5,5h-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) [37].…”
Section: Inhibition Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All four nucleotides contribute activating or inhibiting inputs. Active tetramer assembly from inactive dimers is promoted by ATP and UTP substrates, which bind at an interfacial active site formed by the N-terminal amidoligase domains. ,, Feedback inhibition is effected by the product CTP, which competes with UTP by binding at a distinct but overlapping site . Allosteric regulator GTP is required for efficient CTP synthesis but also can inhibit it; low concentrations (0–200 μM) activate glutamine hydrolysis up to 50-fold, while higher concentrations (IC 50 ≈ 500 μM) inhibit CTP synthesis without affecting glutamine hydrolysis .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%